An Equity Analysis of Scholarships and Loans in Financing Students’ Tertiary Education in the Sarawak Corridor of Renewable Energy (SCORE) Region

Hieng Soon Lau
{"title":"An Equity Analysis of Scholarships and Loans in Financing Students’ Tertiary Education in the Sarawak Corridor of Renewable Energy (SCORE) Region","authors":"Hieng Soon Lau","doi":"10.35370/bjssh.2019.1.1-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the equity of scholarships and student loans at the two private Institutions of higher learning in the Sarawak Corridor of Renewable Energy (SCORE) region. Surveys involving undergraduates of two private institutions of higher learning were conducted. Using cross-tabulation, the equality of scholarship and loan distributions to undergraduates with reference to four independent variables: ethnicity, gender, areas of origin and income groups were investigated. Chi-square test was used to examine associations between the provision of scholarships and loans and the four independent variables. By employing cross-tabulation and multiple logistic regression, the scholarship distributions favour male over female and urban over rural respectively in terms of type-1 and type-2 equality measurements. However, cross-tabulation analysis shows that the scholarship distribution favours native in terms of type-1 equality but non-natives for type-2 equality. Multiple regression analysis also indicated that native had more scholarship support than non-natives. For the income groups, both cross-tabulations and multiple regression analyses yielded similar results whereby the high income group received most scholarship, followed by the top-bracket, lowest, low and medium income groups. For the loan distribution, cross-tabulations and multiple logistic regressions indicated that loans favour non-natives over natives, female over male and urban over rural respectively in terms of type-1 and type-2 equality measurements. However, for the income groupings, it showed mixed results respectively when using both analyses. The result also indicated that the probability for students to get scholarships and loans contrast distinctly with one another with given characteristics. Moreover, respondents highly supported the issues surrounding loans as an alternative mechanism of financing tertiary education. To ease the budgetary pressure and for equity and efficiency reasons, it is suggested an income-contingent loans can be introduced as a student financial support.","PeriodicalId":173200,"journal":{"name":"Borneo Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Borneo Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35370/bjssh.2019.1.1-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the equity of scholarships and student loans at the two private Institutions of higher learning in the Sarawak Corridor of Renewable Energy (SCORE) region. Surveys involving undergraduates of two private institutions of higher learning were conducted. Using cross-tabulation, the equality of scholarship and loan distributions to undergraduates with reference to four independent variables: ethnicity, gender, areas of origin and income groups were investigated. Chi-square test was used to examine associations between the provision of scholarships and loans and the four independent variables. By employing cross-tabulation and multiple logistic regression, the scholarship distributions favour male over female and urban over rural respectively in terms of type-1 and type-2 equality measurements. However, cross-tabulation analysis shows that the scholarship distribution favours native in terms of type-1 equality but non-natives for type-2 equality. Multiple regression analysis also indicated that native had more scholarship support than non-natives. For the income groups, both cross-tabulations and multiple regression analyses yielded similar results whereby the high income group received most scholarship, followed by the top-bracket, lowest, low and medium income groups. For the loan distribution, cross-tabulations and multiple logistic regressions indicated that loans favour non-natives over natives, female over male and urban over rural respectively in terms of type-1 and type-2 equality measurements. However, for the income groupings, it showed mixed results respectively when using both analyses. The result also indicated that the probability for students to get scholarships and loans contrast distinctly with one another with given characteristics. Moreover, respondents highly supported the issues surrounding loans as an alternative mechanism of financing tertiary education. To ease the budgetary pressure and for equity and efficiency reasons, it is suggested an income-contingent loans can be introduced as a student financial support.
沙捞越可再生能源走廊(SCORE)地区学生高等教育资助奖学金和贷款的公平性分析
本文考察了沙捞越可再生能源走廊(SCORE)地区两所私立高等教育机构的奖学金和学生贷款的公平性。调查对象为两所私立高等院校的本科生。采用交叉表法,根据四个自变量:种族、性别、原籍地区和收入群体,调查了大学生奖学金和贷款分配的平等性。卡方检验用于检验奖学金和贷款的提供与四个自变量之间的关系。通过交叉表法和多元逻辑回归分析,在1型和2型平等测量中,奖学金的分布分别倾向于男性而不是女性和城市而不是农村。然而,交叉表分析表明,在类型1平等方面,奖学金分配倾向于本地人,而在类型2平等方面,奖学金分配倾向于非本地人。多元回归分析也表明,本土学生获得的奖学金支持高于非本土学生。对于收入群体,交叉表和多元回归分析都得出了类似的结果,即高收入群体获得的奖学金最多,其次是最高收入群体、最低收入群体、低收入群体和中等收入群体。对于贷款分布,交叉表和多重逻辑回归表明,在1型和2型平等测量中,贷款分别对非本地人有利,对女性有利,对男性有利,对城市有利。然而,对于收入分组,当使用两种分析时,分别显示出混合的结果。结果还表明,在给定的特征下,学生获得奖学金和贷款的概率有明显的差异。此外,受访者高度支持将贷款作为资助高等教育的另一种机制。为了缓解预算压力,同时考虑到公平和效率,建议引入按收入分配的贷款作为学生的财政支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信