Resolution of Cases in the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation without a Hearing: History, Problems, Tendencies

O. V. Brezhnev
{"title":"Resolution of Cases in the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation without a Hearing: History, Problems, Tendencies","authors":"O. V. Brezhnev","doi":"10.18572/2072-3636-2021-2-42-46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article reveals the legal nature of resolving cases without holding a hearing (written proceedings) as an organizational form of Russian constitutional legal proceedings. The main stages in the development of legislative regulation of this form of legal proceedings, as well as the trends inherent in each of these stages, are shown: from the use of the written form solely for checking the constitutionality of norms similar to those previously recognized as unconstitutional, to its wider use when, in the opinion of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, there is no need for an oral presentation of the party’s position. The existing gaps and contradictions in the regulation of this institution of constitutional proceedings have been studied.","PeriodicalId":301802,"journal":{"name":"Court administrator","volume":"10 23","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Court administrator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-3636-2021-2-42-46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article reveals the legal nature of resolving cases without holding a hearing (written proceedings) as an organizational form of Russian constitutional legal proceedings. The main stages in the development of legislative regulation of this form of legal proceedings, as well as the trends inherent in each of these stages, are shown: from the use of the written form solely for checking the constitutionality of norms similar to those previously recognized as unconstitutional, to its wider use when, in the opinion of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, there is no need for an oral presentation of the party’s position. The existing gaps and contradictions in the regulation of this institution of constitutional proceedings have been studied.
俄罗斯联邦宪法法院不经听证解决案件:历史、问题和趋势
文章揭示了不开庭解决案件(书面诉讼)作为俄罗斯宪法诉讼的一种组织形式的法律性质。的主要阶段发展的立法监管这种形式的法律诉讼,以及固有的趋势在每一个阶段,显示:单独使用书面形式的检查规范的合宪性类似以前认为是违宪的,它的广泛使用,在俄罗斯联邦宪法法院的意见,没有必要的口头报告党的立场。对我国现行宪法诉讼制度的规制存在的差距和矛盾进行了研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信