{"title":"Connectedness of green investments and uncertainties: new evidence from emerging markets","authors":"A. E. Ogbonna, O. Olubusoye","doi":"10.1108/frep-04-2022-0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study aims to investigate the response of green investments of emerging countries to own-market uncertainty, oil-market uncertainty and COVID-19 effect/geo-political risks (GPRs), using the tail risks of corresponding markets as measures of uncertainty.Design/methodology/approachThis study employs Westerlund and Narayan (2015) (WN)-type distributed lag model that simultaneously accounts for persistence, endogeneity and conditional heteroscedasticity, within a single model framework. The tail risks are obtained using conditional standard deviation of the residuals from an asymmetric autoregressive moving average – ARMA(1,1) – generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity – GARCH(1,1) model framework with Gaussian innovation. For out-of-sample forecast evaluation, the study employs root mean square error (RMSE), and Clark and West (2007) (CW) test for pairwise comparison of nested models, under three forecast horizons; providing statistical justification for incorporating oil tail risks and COVID-19 effects or GPRs in the predictive model.FindingsGreen returns responds significantly to own-market uncertainty (mostly positively), oil-market uncertainty (mostly positively) as well as the COVID-19 effect (mostly negatively), with some evidence of hedging potential against uncertainties that are external to the green investments market. Also, incorporating external uncertainties improves the in-sample predictability and out-of-sample forecasts, and yields some economic gains.Originality/valueThis study contributes originally to the green market-uncertainty literature in four ways. First, it generates daily tail risks (a more realistic measure of uncertainty) for emerging countries’ green returns and global oil prices. Second, it employs WN-type distributed lag model that is well suited to account for conditional heteroscedasticity, endogeneity and persistence effects; which characterizes financial series. Third, it presents both in-sample predictability and out-of-sample forecast performances. Fourth, it provides the economic gains of incorporating own-market, oil-market and COVID-19 uncertainty.","PeriodicalId":122241,"journal":{"name":"Fulbright Review of Economics and Policy","volume":"96 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fulbright Review of Economics and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/frep-04-2022-0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
PurposeThis study aims to investigate the response of green investments of emerging countries to own-market uncertainty, oil-market uncertainty and COVID-19 effect/geo-political risks (GPRs), using the tail risks of corresponding markets as measures of uncertainty.Design/methodology/approachThis study employs Westerlund and Narayan (2015) (WN)-type distributed lag model that simultaneously accounts for persistence, endogeneity and conditional heteroscedasticity, within a single model framework. The tail risks are obtained using conditional standard deviation of the residuals from an asymmetric autoregressive moving average – ARMA(1,1) – generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity – GARCH(1,1) model framework with Gaussian innovation. For out-of-sample forecast evaluation, the study employs root mean square error (RMSE), and Clark and West (2007) (CW) test for pairwise comparison of nested models, under three forecast horizons; providing statistical justification for incorporating oil tail risks and COVID-19 effects or GPRs in the predictive model.FindingsGreen returns responds significantly to own-market uncertainty (mostly positively), oil-market uncertainty (mostly positively) as well as the COVID-19 effect (mostly negatively), with some evidence of hedging potential against uncertainties that are external to the green investments market. Also, incorporating external uncertainties improves the in-sample predictability and out-of-sample forecasts, and yields some economic gains.Originality/valueThis study contributes originally to the green market-uncertainty literature in four ways. First, it generates daily tail risks (a more realistic measure of uncertainty) for emerging countries’ green returns and global oil prices. Second, it employs WN-type distributed lag model that is well suited to account for conditional heteroscedasticity, endogeneity and persistence effects; which characterizes financial series. Third, it presents both in-sample predictability and out-of-sample forecast performances. Fourth, it provides the economic gains of incorporating own-market, oil-market and COVID-19 uncertainty.
本研究旨在探讨新兴国家绿色投资对自身市场不确定性、石油市场不确定性和COVID-19效应/地缘政治风险(GPRs)的反应,使用相应市场的尾部风险作为不确定性的度量。本研究采用Westerlund and Narayan (2015) (WN)型分布滞后模型,该模型在单一模型框架内同时考虑了持久性、内生性和条件异方差。采用高斯创新的非对称自回归移动平均- ARMA(1,1) -广义自回归条件异方差- GARCH(1,1)模型框架,利用残差的条件标准差得到尾部风险。对于样本外预测评估,研究采用均方根误差(RMSE)和Clark and West (2007) (CW)检验对嵌套模型进行两两比较,在三个预测水平下;为将油尾风险和COVID-19效应或gpr纳入预测模型提供统计依据。绿色回报对自身市场的不确定性(主要是积极的)、石油市场的不确定性(主要是积极的)以及COVID-19效应(主要是消极的)有显著的反应,有一些证据表明,绿色投资市场外部的不确定性具有对冲潜力。此外,纳入外部不确定性提高了样本内可预测性和样本外预测,并产生了一些经济收益。原创性/价值本研究在四个方面对绿色市场不确定性文献做出了原创性贡献。首先,它为新兴国家的绿色回报和全球油价带来了每日尾部风险(一种更现实的不确定性衡量标准)。其次,采用适合考虑条件异方差、内生性和持续性效应的wn型分布滞后模型;这是金融系列的特点。第三,它同时具有样本内可预测性和样本外预测性能。第四,它提供了将自有市场、石油市场和COVID-19不确定性纳入其中的经济收益。