Technology and restructuring the electricity market

R. Hakvoort
{"title":"Technology and restructuring the electricity market","authors":"R. Hakvoort","doi":"10.1109/DRPT.2000.855696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the process of liberalising the electricity market, hardly a single country has dared to introduce competition in transmission and distribution. Policy makers restrict the market to generation and supply, mainly based on the assumption that competition in transmission is impossible due to natural monopoly characteristics of the network. This paper investigates the options for competition in transmission. New information technology makes it possible to track individual grid use, so the classic 'collective good' argument applied to electricity transmission loses importance. FACTS technologies hold the promise of more efficient grid management by influencing load flows and improving system stability. Finally, miniaturisation of generation systems may lead to decentral power supply, which, at the extreme, results in self-supporting districts not needing a connection to the high voltage grid any more. After a comparison with the evolution of other network infrastructures it is concluded that a new view on the electricity transmission and distribution infrastructure is called for with far-reaching consequences for policy makers and regulators.","PeriodicalId":127287,"journal":{"name":"DRPT2000. International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies. Proceedings (Cat. No.00EX382)","volume":"23 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DRPT2000. International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies. Proceedings (Cat. No.00EX382)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DRPT.2000.855696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

In the process of liberalising the electricity market, hardly a single country has dared to introduce competition in transmission and distribution. Policy makers restrict the market to generation and supply, mainly based on the assumption that competition in transmission is impossible due to natural monopoly characteristics of the network. This paper investigates the options for competition in transmission. New information technology makes it possible to track individual grid use, so the classic 'collective good' argument applied to electricity transmission loses importance. FACTS technologies hold the promise of more efficient grid management by influencing load flows and improving system stability. Finally, miniaturisation of generation systems may lead to decentral power supply, which, at the extreme, results in self-supporting districts not needing a connection to the high voltage grid any more. After a comparison with the evolution of other network infrastructures it is concluded that a new view on the electricity transmission and distribution infrastructure is called for with far-reaching consequences for policy makers and regulators.
技术和重组电力市场
在电力市场自由化的过程中,几乎没有一个国家敢在输电和配电领域引入竞争。政策制定者将市场限制在发电和供应上,主要是基于这样的假设:由于电网的自然垄断特征,输电方面的竞争是不可能的。本文研究了输电竞争的选择。新的信息技术使跟踪个人电网使用成为可能,因此适用于电力传输的经典“集体利益”论点失去了重要性。FACTS技术通过影响负荷流和提高系统稳定性,有望实现更有效的电网管理。最后,发电系统的小型化可能会导致分散供电,这在极端情况下会导致自给自足的地区不再需要连接到高压电网。在与其他网络基础设施的演变进行比较后,得出结论认为,需要对输配电基础设施提出新的观点,这对政策制定者和监管机构具有深远的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信