Cyber conflict and Islam Ethics on the Ustadz Harassment cases in the YouTube Community

M. Rizkiansyah, Muslikhin
{"title":"Cyber conflict and Islam Ethics on the Ustadz Harassment cases in the YouTube Community","authors":"M. Rizkiansyah, Muslikhin","doi":"10.37698/ashrej.v3i2.79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The number of Indonesia user YouTube Access increases significantly. The content of YouTube also diverse including Islam da'wah in many channels in YouTube both national and international. The comment fixture in YouTube not only simplify users to comment but also create a conflict between users including the Ustadz Abdul Somad Rejection broadcasting. This aim of the research is to figure out how the meaning of YouTube comment and how the application of comment Islam ethics according to Quran and Hadis in the Ustadz Abdul Somad cases on YouTube. This research also using cyber conflict and Quran verse and Hadis related to communication Islam ethics. The method of this research using Netnography where researcher focus to comment columns who indicated have a conflict between users. The data of this research is the comment columns on three video who indicated have an Ustadz Abdul Somad Rejection topic. The result of this research that Pro UAS trying to mobilize opinion to drive out Banser while anti-UAS framing UAS as a radicalism orator and involve in prohibit organization. Both pro-UAS and anti-UAS always mocking each other when creating a conflict. They also think this is the best way to win the debate.","PeriodicalId":146510,"journal":{"name":"Asian Social Science and Humanities Research Journal (ASHREJ)","volume":"12 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Social Science and Humanities Research Journal (ASHREJ)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37698/ashrej.v3i2.79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The number of Indonesia user YouTube Access increases significantly. The content of YouTube also diverse including Islam da'wah in many channels in YouTube both national and international. The comment fixture in YouTube not only simplify users to comment but also create a conflict between users including the Ustadz Abdul Somad Rejection broadcasting. This aim of the research is to figure out how the meaning of YouTube comment and how the application of comment Islam ethics according to Quran and Hadis in the Ustadz Abdul Somad cases on YouTube. This research also using cyber conflict and Quran verse and Hadis related to communication Islam ethics. The method of this research using Netnography where researcher focus to comment columns who indicated have a conflict between users. The data of this research is the comment columns on three video who indicated have an Ustadz Abdul Somad Rejection topic. The result of this research that Pro UAS trying to mobilize opinion to drive out Banser while anti-UAS framing UAS as a radicalism orator and involve in prohibit organization. Both pro-UAS and anti-UAS always mocking each other when creating a conflict. They also think this is the best way to win the debate.
YouTube社区Ustadz骚扰事件的网络冲突与伊斯兰伦理
印度尼西亚用户的YouTube访问数量显著增加。YouTube的内容也很多样化,包括在YouTube的许多国内和国际频道中都有伊斯兰教。YouTube的评论装置不仅简化了用户的评论,而且还造成了用户之间的冲突,包括Ustadz Abdul Somad拒绝广播。本研究的目的是了解YouTube评论的意义,以及根据古兰经和圣训评论伊斯兰伦理在Ustadz Abdul Somad案例中的应用。本研究还运用了网络冲突与古兰经和圣训相关的传播伊斯兰伦理。本研究的方法是使用网络图,研究人员的重点是评论专栏谁表示有用户之间的冲突。本研究的数据是三个视频的评论栏,他们表示有一个Ustadz Abdul Somad拒绝的话题。这项研究的结果是,支持UAS试图动员舆论驱逐班塞,而反UAS将UAS视为激进主义演说家并参与禁止组织。支持和反对无人机系统的双方在制造冲突时总是互相嘲笑。他们还认为这是赢得辩论的最佳方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信