COMPARISON OF DIAGNOSTIC AND RADIOTHERAPY PLANNING PROTOCOLS IN LUNG CANCER TREATMENT

Filip Vlaj, V. Z. Marcius, Katja Škalic
{"title":"COMPARISON OF DIAGNOSTIC AND RADIOTHERAPY PLANNING PROTOCOLS IN LUNG CANCER TREATMENT","authors":"Filip Vlaj, V. Z. Marcius, Katja Škalic","doi":"10.47724/MIRTJ.2020.I02.A002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of the study was to compare a standard diagnostic protocol for computed tomography imaging on a positron emission tomography scanner at the Department of Nuclear Medicine, and a radiotherapy imaging protocol for pre-planning needs in radiotherapy for lung cancer treatment, to determine the differences between these two protocols and to propose possible improvements in the dose optimisation for computed tomography imaging in a radiotherapy protocol. Methods: In this retrospective study, data were collected via the SyngoVia program and statistically analysed according to the patient dose load in computed tomography imaging in standard and radiotherapy protocols. The analysis encompassed data on a total of 56 patients in the period from 1 January 2017 to 1 December 2018. We compared data on patient dose load in computed tomography imaging in a standard protocol before and after the introduction of the improved sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction method (SAFIRE). Results and discussion: It was established that there are statistically significant differences in dose per patient (p<) in computed tomography imaging in standard and radiotherapy protocols. Statistically significant differences were also established in computed tomography imaging in the standard protocol before and after the introduction of the improved iterative reconstruction method (p=0,001). Dose load on the lung in computed tomography imaging was 67.5% lower in the standard protocol with the iterative reconstruction in image space (IRIS) method than in the radiotherapy protocol. The introduction of the improved SAFIRE method additionally lowered the dose per patient by 34.2% compared to the IRIS method. Conclusion: In the future, the introduction of the improved iterative reconstruction method is possible for the reconstruction of tomographic images, including for radiotherapy imaging protocol that takes into account the impact of the indirect reduction in the dose on the accuracy of the identification of tumour target volumes when planning radiation treatment for the patient. Key words: positron emission tomography with computed tomography, iterative reconstruction, dose optimization, lung cancer, radiation treatment planning","PeriodicalId":271343,"journal":{"name":"MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIOTHERAPY JOURNAL","volume":"30 11-12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIOTHERAPY JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47724/MIRTJ.2020.I02.A002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to compare a standard diagnostic protocol for computed tomography imaging on a positron emission tomography scanner at the Department of Nuclear Medicine, and a radiotherapy imaging protocol for pre-planning needs in radiotherapy for lung cancer treatment, to determine the differences between these two protocols and to propose possible improvements in the dose optimisation for computed tomography imaging in a radiotherapy protocol. Methods: In this retrospective study, data were collected via the SyngoVia program and statistically analysed according to the patient dose load in computed tomography imaging in standard and radiotherapy protocols. The analysis encompassed data on a total of 56 patients in the period from 1 January 2017 to 1 December 2018. We compared data on patient dose load in computed tomography imaging in a standard protocol before and after the introduction of the improved sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction method (SAFIRE). Results and discussion: It was established that there are statistically significant differences in dose per patient (p<) in computed tomography imaging in standard and radiotherapy protocols. Statistically significant differences were also established in computed tomography imaging in the standard protocol before and after the introduction of the improved iterative reconstruction method (p=0,001). Dose load on the lung in computed tomography imaging was 67.5% lower in the standard protocol with the iterative reconstruction in image space (IRIS) method than in the radiotherapy protocol. The introduction of the improved SAFIRE method additionally lowered the dose per patient by 34.2% compared to the IRIS method. Conclusion: In the future, the introduction of the improved iterative reconstruction method is possible for the reconstruction of tomographic images, including for radiotherapy imaging protocol that takes into account the impact of the indirect reduction in the dose on the accuracy of the identification of tumour target volumes when planning radiation treatment for the patient. Key words: positron emission tomography with computed tomography, iterative reconstruction, dose optimization, lung cancer, radiation treatment planning
肺癌诊断与放疗方案的比较
目的:本研究的目的是比较核医学系正电子发射断层扫描计算机断层成像的标准诊断方案和肺癌放射治疗预先计划需要的放射治疗成像方案,以确定这两个方案之间的差异,并提出放射治疗方案中计算机断层成像剂量优化的可能改进。方法:本回顾性研究通过SyngoVia程序收集数据,并根据患者在标准和放疗方案中的计算机断层扫描成像剂量负荷进行统计分析。该分析包括2017年1月1日至2018年12月1日期间共56名患者的数据。我们比较了在引入改进的正弦图确认迭代重建方法(SAFIRE)之前和之后的标准方案中计算机断层成像患者剂量负荷的数据。结果与讨论:在标准方案和放疗方案中,计算机断层成像的每例剂量有统计学意义差异(p<)。引入改进的迭代重建方法前后,标准方案中计算机断层成像的差异也有统计学意义(p= 0.001)。采用图像空间迭代重建(IRIS)方法的标准方案比放射治疗方案对肺的剂量负荷降低67.5%。与IRIS方法相比,改进的SAFIRE方法的引入还使每位患者的剂量降低了34.2%。结论:在未来,引入改进的迭代重建方法可能用于断层图像的重建,包括在放疗成像方案中,在为患者规划放射治疗时考虑到间接剂量降低对肿瘤靶体积识别准确性的影响。关键词:正电子发射计算机断层扫描,迭代重建,剂量优化,肺癌,放射治疗计划
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信