PERBEDAAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH DENGAN PENDEKATAN INVESTIGASI DAN PENDEKATAN KONVENSIONAL PADA POKOK BAHASAN TEOREMA PHYTAGORAS DI KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI 9 PEMATANGSIANTAR

Theresia Monika Siahaan
{"title":"PERBEDAAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH DENGAN PENDEKATAN INVESTIGASI DAN PENDEKATAN KONVENSIONAL PADA POKOK BAHASAN TEOREMA PHYTAGORAS DI KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI 9 PEMATANGSIANTAR","authors":"Theresia Monika Siahaan","doi":"10.30743/MES.V4I2.1534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. This study aims to determine whether there are differences in mathematical problem solving abilities of students who are taught through an investigative approach and with conventional approaches in class VIII SMP 9 of Pematangsiantar. This type of research is experimental research. The population in this study were all eighth grade students of SMP 9 of Pematangsiantar as many as 8 classes. The problem solving abilities of students taught with an investigative approach to the average pretest of 57.73 and post-test of 85.42, the level of change in problem solving abilities was 27.69. Higher than the problem solving abilities of students who are taught with conventional learning the average pretest is 56.67 and posttest is 72.67. Hypothesis testing, from the calculation of student pretest data obtained at dk = 64 and the real level α = 0.05 and 𝑡(1−12∝)=𝑡0,975 obtained ttable = 1.669 and tcount = 1.172. Because tcount < ttable = (1.172 <1.669) it can be concluded that the initial ability of students is the same. While based on the calculation of student posttest data obtained at dk = 64 and the real level α = 0.05 obtained ttable = 1.669 and t count = 4.212. Because tcount> ttable (4.212 > 1.669) then Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. Then it was concluded that there were significant differences between problem solving abilities taught by an investigative approach and conventional approaches.Keywords: Problem Solving Ability, Investigative Approach, Conventional Approach.","PeriodicalId":303412,"journal":{"name":"MES: Journal of Mathematics Education and Science","volume":"309 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MES: Journal of Mathematics Education and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30743/MES.V4I2.1534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. This study aims to determine whether there are differences in mathematical problem solving abilities of students who are taught through an investigative approach and with conventional approaches in class VIII SMP 9 of Pematangsiantar. This type of research is experimental research. The population in this study were all eighth grade students of SMP 9 of Pematangsiantar as many as 8 classes. The problem solving abilities of students taught with an investigative approach to the average pretest of 57.73 and post-test of 85.42, the level of change in problem solving abilities was 27.69. Higher than the problem solving abilities of students who are taught with conventional learning the average pretest is 56.67 and posttest is 72.67. Hypothesis testing, from the calculation of student pretest data obtained at dk = 64 and the real level α = 0.05 and 𝑡(1−12∝)=𝑡0,975 obtained ttable = 1.669 and tcount = 1.172. Because tcount < ttable = (1.172 <1.669) it can be concluded that the initial ability of students is the same. While based on the calculation of student posttest data obtained at dk = 64 and the real level α = 0.05 obtained ttable = 1.669 and t count = 4.212. Because tcount> ttable (4.212 > 1.669) then Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. Then it was concluded that there were significant differences between problem solving abilities taught by an investigative approach and conventional approaches.Keywords: Problem Solving Ability, Investigative Approach, Conventional Approach.
问题解决能力的不同之处在于调查方法和传统方法在八年级国家八年级学生之间的科学定理上的研究方法和方法
摘要本研究的目的是要确定在培马唐小学八班,采用研究性教学法和传统教学法的学生在解决数学问题的能力上是否有差异。这种类型的研究是实验性研究。本研究的人群均为佩马唐仙达中学九年级八年级学生,共8个班。研究性教学法学生的问题解决能力前测平均为57.73分,后测平均为85.42分,问题解决能力变化水平为27.69分。前测平均分为56.67分,后测平均分为72.67分。假设检验,从计算学生前测数据得到dk = 64,真实水平α = 0.05,𝑡(1−12∝)=𝑡0,975得到表= 1.669,tcount = 1.172。因为tcount < ttable = (1.172 ttable(4.212 > 1.669)),所以Ho被拒绝,Ha被接受。然后得出结论,研究性方法和传统方法教授的问题解决能力之间存在显着差异。关键词:问题解决能力,调查方法,传统方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信