Evaluation of Intraoperative Imprint Cytology and Frozen Section in Determination of Tumor and Tumor Margins

Dr. Nishana Chackam Pallialil, Dr. Vamseedhar Annam, D. S, Dr. Maheswari, P
{"title":"Evaluation of Intraoperative Imprint Cytology and Frozen Section in Determination of Tumor and Tumor Margins","authors":"Dr. Nishana Chackam Pallialil, Dr. Vamseedhar Annam, D. S, Dr. Maheswari, P","doi":"10.36348/sjpm.2023.v08i01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intraoperative pathology consultation is often required for guiding immediate surgical decisions so as to limit the extent of surgery. Accurate intraoperative diagnosis is crucial. The present study evaluates the accuracy of imprint cytology and frozen section in intraoperative consultation for tumor and tumor margins. A total of 157 tissue specimens for type of lesion, tumor margins and lymphnode metastasis were included. Imprint was taken by holding the tissue bit with forceps and touching it onto a clean glass slide without undue pressure or lateral movements. They were stained with Papanicolaou, May-Grunwald Giemsa and Hematoxylin and Eosin [H&E] stains. The tissue bits taken were then embedded and frozen. Section cutting was done using cryostat and were stained using rapid Haematoxylin and Eosin stain, and examined under a light microscope. Later, the tissue was fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for routine histopathological processing then stained with H&E stain. Based on the histological diagnosis, the accuracy of intraoperative imprint cytology and frozen section were evaluated. A total of 157 tissue specimens were received during the study period, which were classified into specimens for type of tumor [145 specimens], tumor margins [54 specimens] and lymph node metastasis [7 specimens] for analysis. The overall diagnostic accuracy of imprint cytology in detection of type of tumor was 97.9% and that of frozen section was 98.6%. It can be concluded that imprint cytology typically provides the accurate diagnosis without the need for a sophisticated machine such as cryostat which is required for frozen section analysis.","PeriodicalId":407259,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Pathology and Microbiology","volume":"15 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Pathology and Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36348/sjpm.2023.v08i01.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intraoperative pathology consultation is often required for guiding immediate surgical decisions so as to limit the extent of surgery. Accurate intraoperative diagnosis is crucial. The present study evaluates the accuracy of imprint cytology and frozen section in intraoperative consultation for tumor and tumor margins. A total of 157 tissue specimens for type of lesion, tumor margins and lymphnode metastasis were included. Imprint was taken by holding the tissue bit with forceps and touching it onto a clean glass slide without undue pressure or lateral movements. They were stained with Papanicolaou, May-Grunwald Giemsa and Hematoxylin and Eosin [H&E] stains. The tissue bits taken were then embedded and frozen. Section cutting was done using cryostat and were stained using rapid Haematoxylin and Eosin stain, and examined under a light microscope. Later, the tissue was fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for routine histopathological processing then stained with H&E stain. Based on the histological diagnosis, the accuracy of intraoperative imprint cytology and frozen section were evaluated. A total of 157 tissue specimens were received during the study period, which were classified into specimens for type of tumor [145 specimens], tumor margins [54 specimens] and lymph node metastasis [7 specimens] for analysis. The overall diagnostic accuracy of imprint cytology in detection of type of tumor was 97.9% and that of frozen section was 98.6%. It can be concluded that imprint cytology typically provides the accurate diagnosis without the need for a sophisticated machine such as cryostat which is required for frozen section analysis.
术中印迹细胞学和冰冻切片在确定肿瘤和肿瘤边缘中的应用价值
术中病理咨询通常需要指导立即的手术决定,以限制手术的范围。准确的术中诊断至关重要。本研究评估印迹细胞学和冷冻切片术中会诊肿瘤和肿瘤边缘的准确性。共纳入157例病变类型、肿瘤边缘及淋巴结转移的组织标本。印记是通过用镊子握住组织钻头并将其触摸到干净的玻璃载玻片上而没有过度的压力或横向移动来获得的。采用Papanicolaou、May-Grunwald Giemsa、苏木精和伊红[H&E]染色。然后将取出的组织块植入并冷冻。低温冷冻切片,快速红木精和伊红染色,光镜下观察。随后,将组织固定在10%中性缓冲福尔马林中进行常规组织病理学处理,然后用H&E染色。在组织学诊断的基础上,评价术中印迹细胞学检查和冷冻切片检查的准确性。研究期间共收到组织标本157例,按肿瘤类型[145例]、肿瘤边缘[54例]、淋巴结转移[7例]进行分类分析。印迹细胞学对肿瘤类型的总体诊断准确率为97.9%,冷冻切片的诊断准确率为98.6%。可以得出结论,印迹细胞学通常提供准确的诊断,而不需要复杂的机器,如冷冻切片分析所需的低温恒温器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书