Status of DNA Barcoding Coverage for the Tropical Western Atlantic Shorefishes and Reef Fishes

DNA Barcodes Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.1515/DNA-2015-0011
B. Victor, Martha Valdez-Moreno, L. Vásquez-Yeomans
{"title":"Status of DNA Barcoding Coverage for the Tropical Western Atlantic Shorefishes and Reef Fishes","authors":"B. Victor, Martha Valdez-Moreno, L. Vásquez-Yeomans","doi":"10.1515/DNA-2015-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Barcode coverage is difficult to assess for large regions due to incomplete species lists, inaccurate identifications, and cryptic diversity. However, as coverage approaches completion, it becomes possible to critically evaluate identifications and validate barcode lineages. We collate the results of the FISH-BOL barcode project and assess coverage for each family of bony shorefishes and reef fishes from the tropical western Atlantic Ocean. Methodology: We identify to species the public and private barcode lineages from the region on BOLD, confirming identifications by vouchers, phylogeographic deduction, and the process of elimination. The lineages and BINs are assigned to species from a comprehensive species list for the region. Results: We estimate 1029 of 1311 total bony shorefish species in the region are barcoded (78.5%). For reef-associated fishes, 902 of 1083 species are barcoded (83.3%). About 70 of the 181 species not yet barcoded are endemic species from Florida/ Gulf of Mexico or Venezuela, leaving about 90% of the central Caribbean reef fish species barcoded to date. Most species are represented by one barcode lineage, but among the gobioids and blennioids there are many more lineages (BINs) than species, indicating substantial cryptic diversity. Conclusions: As barcode coverage for a region approaches completion, a robust assessment of coverage can be made. The reef fish fauna of the tropical western Atlantic now has the highest coverage for a large marine area, from about 80 to 90% depending on definitions and geographic limits.","PeriodicalId":446240,"journal":{"name":"DNA Barcodes","volume":"96 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DNA Barcodes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/DNA-2015-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: Barcode coverage is difficult to assess for large regions due to incomplete species lists, inaccurate identifications, and cryptic diversity. However, as coverage approaches completion, it becomes possible to critically evaluate identifications and validate barcode lineages. We collate the results of the FISH-BOL barcode project and assess coverage for each family of bony shorefishes and reef fishes from the tropical western Atlantic Ocean. Methodology: We identify to species the public and private barcode lineages from the region on BOLD, confirming identifications by vouchers, phylogeographic deduction, and the process of elimination. The lineages and BINs are assigned to species from a comprehensive species list for the region. Results: We estimate 1029 of 1311 total bony shorefish species in the region are barcoded (78.5%). For reef-associated fishes, 902 of 1083 species are barcoded (83.3%). About 70 of the 181 species not yet barcoded are endemic species from Florida/ Gulf of Mexico or Venezuela, leaving about 90% of the central Caribbean reef fish species barcoded to date. Most species are represented by one barcode lineage, but among the gobioids and blennioids there are many more lineages (BINs) than species, indicating substantial cryptic diversity. Conclusions: As barcode coverage for a region approaches completion, a robust assessment of coverage can be made. The reef fish fauna of the tropical western Atlantic now has the highest coverage for a large marine area, from about 80 to 90% depending on definitions and geographic limits.
热带西大西洋滨鱼和礁鱼DNA条形码覆盖现状
背景:由于物种列表不完整、鉴定不准确和多样性模糊,条形码覆盖范围难以评估。然而,随着覆盖接近完成,批判性地评估识别和验证条形码谱系成为可能。我们整理了FISH-BOL条形码项目的结果,并评估了来自热带西大西洋的多骨滨鱼和礁鱼的每个科的覆盖率。方法:我们在BOLD上对该地区的公共和私人条形码谱系进行物种鉴定,通过凭证、系统地理推断和消除过程确认鉴定。从该地区的综合物种列表中分配了物种的谱系和bin。结果:该地区1311种硬骨滨鱼中有1029种被条形码识别,占78.5%。在1083种珊瑚礁相关鱼类中,有902种(83.3%)被条形码识别。在尚未进行条形码识别的181种鱼类中,约有70种是佛罗里达/墨西哥湾或委内瑞拉的特有物种,到目前为止,加勒比海中部约90%的珊瑚礁鱼类都进行了条形码识别。大多数物种由一个条形码谱系代表,但在虾鱼种和双鱼种中,谱系(bin)比物种多,表明了大量的隐多样性。结论:随着条形码覆盖区域接近完成,可以对覆盖范围进行可靠的评估。热带西大西洋的珊瑚鱼动物群现在在一个大的海洋区域内拥有最高的覆盖率,根据定义和地理限制,从80%到90%不等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信