Adalbert Gerald Soosai Raj, J. Patel, Richard Halverson
{"title":"Is More Active Always Better for Teaching Introductory Programming?","authors":"Adalbert Gerald Soosai Raj, J. Patel, Richard Halverson","doi":"10.1109/LaTICE.2018.00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction to programming is usually taught using a wide range of instructional techniques. Some common techniques among them are mini-lectures, live-coding and in-class coding. Each of these three techniques require varying level of student activity. In this study, we taught programming to a group of students using these three techniques. We collected data in the form of a survey to understand the students' perceptions on these three instructional techniques. The results suggest that students like techniques that require a moderate level of student activity (e.g., live-coding) more when compared to techniques that require a great deal of student activity (e.g., in-class coding). We believe that our work has the potential to help instructors design their instructional techniques using a student-centric approach.","PeriodicalId":223757,"journal":{"name":"2018 International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTICE)","volume":"56 18","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTICE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LaTICE.2018.00006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Abstract
Introduction to programming is usually taught using a wide range of instructional techniques. Some common techniques among them are mini-lectures, live-coding and in-class coding. Each of these three techniques require varying level of student activity. In this study, we taught programming to a group of students using these three techniques. We collected data in the form of a survey to understand the students' perceptions on these three instructional techniques. The results suggest that students like techniques that require a moderate level of student activity (e.g., live-coding) more when compared to techniques that require a great deal of student activity (e.g., in-class coding). We believe that our work has the potential to help instructors design their instructional techniques using a student-centric approach.