Is More Active Always Better for Teaching Introductory Programming?

Adalbert Gerald Soosai Raj, J. Patel, Richard Halverson
{"title":"Is More Active Always Better for Teaching Introductory Programming?","authors":"Adalbert Gerald Soosai Raj, J. Patel, Richard Halverson","doi":"10.1109/LaTICE.2018.00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction to programming is usually taught using a wide range of instructional techniques. Some common techniques among them are mini-lectures, live-coding and in-class coding. Each of these three techniques require varying level of student activity. In this study, we taught programming to a group of students using these three techniques. We collected data in the form of a survey to understand the students' perceptions on these three instructional techniques. The results suggest that students like techniques that require a moderate level of student activity (e.g., live-coding) more when compared to techniques that require a great deal of student activity (e.g., in-class coding). We believe that our work has the potential to help instructors design their instructional techniques using a student-centric approach.","PeriodicalId":223757,"journal":{"name":"2018 International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTICE)","volume":"56 18","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTICE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LaTICE.2018.00006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Introduction to programming is usually taught using a wide range of instructional techniques. Some common techniques among them are mini-lectures, live-coding and in-class coding. Each of these three techniques require varying level of student activity. In this study, we taught programming to a group of students using these three techniques. We collected data in the form of a survey to understand the students' perceptions on these three instructional techniques. The results suggest that students like techniques that require a moderate level of student activity (e.g., live-coding) more when compared to techniques that require a great deal of student activity (e.g., in-class coding). We believe that our work has the potential to help instructors design their instructional techniques using a student-centric approach.
更积极的编程入门教学总是更好吗?
程序设计导论通常使用广泛的教学技术进行教学。其中一些常见的技术是迷你讲座、现场编码和课堂编码。这三种技术中的每一种都需要不同程度的学生活动。在这项研究中,我们使用这三种技术向一组学生教授编程。我们以调查的形式收集数据,以了解学生对这三种教学方法的看法。结果表明,与需要大量学生活动的技术(例如,课堂编码)相比,学生更喜欢需要中等水平学生活动的技术(例如,现场编码)。我们相信我们的工作有潜力帮助教师使用以学生为中心的方法来设计他们的教学技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信