EIA AUDITING TO DETERMINE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE

A. Morrison‐Saunders
{"title":"EIA AUDITING TO DETERMINE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE","authors":"A. Morrison‐Saunders","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1099-0925(199602)3:1<21::AID-EMA30>3.0.CO;2-#","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Environmental auditing is an important tool for providing an account of post-development environmental impact assessment (EIA) activities. In the past much EIA auditing has focused on predictive techniques and prediction accuracy, which provide little information on the actual environmental outcomes. However, of central interest in determining the effectiveness of EIA is the extent to which the environment is managed and protected as a result of the EIA process as it is intended. A framework is presented for EIA auditing which focuses on the environmental management outcomes of projects that have undergone EIA. The audit methodology for determining EIA effectiveness focuses on several distinct EIA components: impact prediction; occurrence of actual impacts; and the management of potential and actual environmental impacts. These are examined with particular attention to impact and environmental management outcomes. The results are stored in a computerized database which can be used as an implementation record for individual projects that have undergone EIA or for the statistical analysis of large numbers of projects collectively to present an overall picture of EIA environmental management performance. This approach to EIA auditing has applications for project managers, EIA assessment authorities, policy-makers and academics alike. Some preliminary results of an EIA audit of six case studies in Western Australia are presented. These indicate that the EIA process has focused attention on significant issues. Correlation exists between issue identification and the implementation of environmental management actions irrespective of predictive accuracy. Some management activities have avoided impacts occurring. Many impacts have been responded to irrespective of whether they were predicted accurately or even considered in predictions. Overall, an effective environmental management regime was established by the EIA process utilized for the six case studies.","PeriodicalId":268690,"journal":{"name":"Eco-management and Auditing","volume":"19 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eco-management and Auditing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0925(199602)3:1<21::AID-EMA30>3.0.CO;2-#","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Environmental auditing is an important tool for providing an account of post-development environmental impact assessment (EIA) activities. In the past much EIA auditing has focused on predictive techniques and prediction accuracy, which provide little information on the actual environmental outcomes. However, of central interest in determining the effectiveness of EIA is the extent to which the environment is managed and protected as a result of the EIA process as it is intended. A framework is presented for EIA auditing which focuses on the environmental management outcomes of projects that have undergone EIA. The audit methodology for determining EIA effectiveness focuses on several distinct EIA components: impact prediction; occurrence of actual impacts; and the management of potential and actual environmental impacts. These are examined with particular attention to impact and environmental management outcomes. The results are stored in a computerized database which can be used as an implementation record for individual projects that have undergone EIA or for the statistical analysis of large numbers of projects collectively to present an overall picture of EIA environmental management performance. This approach to EIA auditing has applications for project managers, EIA assessment authorities, policy-makers and academics alike. Some preliminary results of an EIA audit of six case studies in Western Australia are presented. These indicate that the EIA process has focused attention on significant issues. Correlation exists between issue identification and the implementation of environmental management actions irrespective of predictive accuracy. Some management activities have avoided impacts occurring. Many impacts have been responded to irrespective of whether they were predicted accurately or even considered in predictions. Overall, an effective environmental management regime was established by the EIA process utilized for the six case studies.
环境影响评估审核以确定环境管理绩效
环境审计是提供发展后环境影响评价活动的一项重要工具。过去的环境影响评估审计主要集中在预测技术和预测准确性上,对实际环境结果提供的信息很少。然而,在确定环境影响评估的有效性时,最重要的是环境影响评估过程在多大程度上如预期的那样得到管理和保护。提出了环评审计的框架,重点关注已进行环评的项目的环境管理结果。确定环评有效性的审计方法侧重于几个不同的环评组成部分:影响预测;实际影响的发生;以及对潜在和实际环境影响的管理。这些审查特别注意影响和环境管理成果。评估结果储存在电脑资料库中,可作为个别经环评的项目的执行记录,或对大量项目进行统计分析,以呈现环评环境管理表现的整体情况。这种方法适用于项目管理者、环评机构、政策制定者和学者。本文介绍了对西澳大利亚州六个案例进行的环评审计的一些初步结果。这些都表明,环评过程已将注意力集中在重大问题上。无论预测的准确性如何,问题识别与环境管理行动的实施之间存在相关性。一些管理活动避免了影响的发生。无论预测是否准确,甚至在预测中是否考虑到这些影响,人们都对它们做出了反应。总体而言,六个个案研究采用的环评程序建立了一个有效的环境管理制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信