Revisiting Stan Douglas’s ‘Cinema Of Operations’

Jihoon Kim
{"title":"Revisiting Stan Douglas’s ‘Cinema Of Operations’","authors":"Jihoon Kim","doi":"10.1086/722144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stan Douglas had pioneered film and video installations inside the gallery walls in the 1980s, before the ‘cinema of exhibition’ – to borrow critic Jean-Christophe Royoux’s term – became a notable trend in artists’ moving-image work since the 1990s.1 Indeed, Douglas’s major works of the 1990s and 2000s led this trend in their attempts to renew the space and time of narrative cinema in ways that transcend the confines of the standardised cinematic apparatus in the movie theatre. In so doing, they also attempted to transform the perceptual and mnemonic dimensions of cinematic spectatorship, whose canonical model is predicated upon the stably intertwined coordination of the frontal screen, a single projector and a limited span of a film’s running time. In Between Film, Video, and the Digital: Hybrid Moving Images in the Post-media Age (2016), I proposed ‘spatialization (materializing the spectatorial experience of the film image, montage, and narrative in the theatrical or architectural forms of screen-related apparatuses) and temporalization (manipulating the time of the image by means of digital video’s capacities) as two key operations that video technologies execute in adopting and altering the components and historical traces of cinema’.2 In this vein, I characterised Douglas’s ‘recombinant’ video installation works (pieces that combine narrative units – scenes, dialogues, soundtracks, visual cues, etc. – that originate from other existing materials such as film, television and literary or historical texts) as being able to ‘re-temporalize cinematic narrative to the extent that goes beyond the viewer’s threshold of perception’.3","PeriodicalId":158397,"journal":{"name":"Afterall: A Journal of Art, Context and Enquiry","volume":"14 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Afterall: A Journal of Art, Context and Enquiry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/722144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stan Douglas had pioneered film and video installations inside the gallery walls in the 1980s, before the ‘cinema of exhibition’ – to borrow critic Jean-Christophe Royoux’s term – became a notable trend in artists’ moving-image work since the 1990s.1 Indeed, Douglas’s major works of the 1990s and 2000s led this trend in their attempts to renew the space and time of narrative cinema in ways that transcend the confines of the standardised cinematic apparatus in the movie theatre. In so doing, they also attempted to transform the perceptual and mnemonic dimensions of cinematic spectatorship, whose canonical model is predicated upon the stably intertwined coordination of the frontal screen, a single projector and a limited span of a film’s running time. In Between Film, Video, and the Digital: Hybrid Moving Images in the Post-media Age (2016), I proposed ‘spatialization (materializing the spectatorial experience of the film image, montage, and narrative in the theatrical or architectural forms of screen-related apparatuses) and temporalization (manipulating the time of the image by means of digital video’s capacities) as two key operations that video technologies execute in adopting and altering the components and historical traces of cinema’.2 In this vein, I characterised Douglas’s ‘recombinant’ video installation works (pieces that combine narrative units – scenes, dialogues, soundtracks, visual cues, etc. – that originate from other existing materials such as film, television and literary or historical texts) as being able to ‘re-temporalize cinematic narrative to the extent that goes beyond the viewer’s threshold of perception’.3
重温斯坦·道格拉斯的“行动电影院”
20世纪80年代,斯坦·道格拉斯(Stan Douglas)在“展览电影”(借用评论家让-克里斯托夫·罗尤(Jean-Christophe Royoux)的术语)成为艺术家运动影像作品的显著趋势之前,率先在画廊墙壁内安装了电影和录像装置事实上,道格拉斯在20世纪90年代和21世纪初的主要作品引领了这一趋势,他们试图以超越电影院标准化电影设备限制的方式更新叙事电影的空间和时间。在这样做的过程中,他们也试图改变电影观众的感知和记忆维度,其规范模型是基于正面屏幕,单个放映机和电影放映时间有限的稳定交织的协调。在电影、视频和数字之间:在《后媒体时代的混合运动影像》(2016)中,我提出了“空间化(将电影影像、蒙太奇和叙事的观影体验物质化,以与屏幕相关的设备的戏剧或建筑形式呈现)和时间化(通过数字视频的能力操纵影像的时间)是视频技术在采用和改变电影的组成部分和历史痕迹时所执行的两个关键操作”在这种情况下,我将道格拉斯的“重组”视频装置作品(将叙事单元——场景、对话、配乐、视觉线索等——结合在一起的作品,这些叙事单元源于其他现有材料,如电影、电视和文学或历史文本)描述为能够“将电影叙事重新时间化,达到超出观众感知门槛的程度”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书