Islamic Style” Secular Architecture in Egypt: 6th October and Al-Shaikh Zayid as Case Studies

Tarek Galal
{"title":"Islamic Style” Secular Architecture in Egypt: 6th October and Al-Shaikh Zayid as Case Studies","authors":"Tarek Galal","doi":"10.21608/msaeng.2022.273843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is a sequel to a study paper which discussed the “Islamic Style” architecture in Egypt using the buildings of 6th October and Zayid cities as case studies. The first study analyzed the residential examples. In this paper the non-residential secular buildings were analyzed, while the religious buildings will be the topic of a third forthcoming study. The secular non-residential buildings found were a very small number (twelve only) and have been categorized into commercial, public and educational. No one dominant or clear Islamic style has been noted, and out of seven contemporary styles of architecture we know of only three were noted in our case studies: eclectic (two), neo-Islamic (three) and the dominating Modern Simplified Islamic (seven), yet we find great variations in each style and no consensus on the vocabulary used or details. The study suggests four reasons for using the Islamic styles in those types: expected patron/owners’ image, design intent, need for differentiation, nostalgia and creating a marketable image. It is also noted that in all of the examples recorded with one exception, the Islamic styles or principles were limited to the facades but were not reflected in the layout. Only one example echoed an Islamic urban pattern for its layout in addition to its façade detailing. The situation can be described as chaotic fraught with eclectic styles, with borrowings and re-interpretations of details from different eras and countries, with no clear dominant “style” emerging or even beginning to evolve. No specific style or detail dominated. This eclecticism and chaos is most probably a reflection of the lack of familiarity of the historical styles by the designers, with exceptions of some successful interpretations. Once again, our analysis shows that the lack of identity","PeriodicalId":440630,"journal":{"name":"MSA Engineering Journal","volume":"26 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MSA Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/msaeng.2022.273843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper is a sequel to a study paper which discussed the “Islamic Style” architecture in Egypt using the buildings of 6th October and Zayid cities as case studies. The first study analyzed the residential examples. In this paper the non-residential secular buildings were analyzed, while the religious buildings will be the topic of a third forthcoming study. The secular non-residential buildings found were a very small number (twelve only) and have been categorized into commercial, public and educational. No one dominant or clear Islamic style has been noted, and out of seven contemporary styles of architecture we know of only three were noted in our case studies: eclectic (two), neo-Islamic (three) and the dominating Modern Simplified Islamic (seven), yet we find great variations in each style and no consensus on the vocabulary used or details. The study suggests four reasons for using the Islamic styles in those types: expected patron/owners’ image, design intent, need for differentiation, nostalgia and creating a marketable image. It is also noted that in all of the examples recorded with one exception, the Islamic styles or principles were limited to the facades but were not reflected in the layout. Only one example echoed an Islamic urban pattern for its layout in addition to its façade detailing. The situation can be described as chaotic fraught with eclectic styles, with borrowings and re-interpretations of details from different eras and countries, with no clear dominant “style” emerging or even beginning to evolve. No specific style or detail dominated. This eclecticism and chaos is most probably a reflection of the lack of familiarity of the historical styles by the designers, with exceptions of some successful interpretations. Once again, our analysis shows that the lack of identity
伊斯兰风格”世俗建筑在埃及:10月6日和Al-Shaikh Zayid作为案例研究
这篇论文是一篇研究论文的续集,该研究论文讨论了埃及的“伊斯兰风格”建筑,使用了10月6日和扎伊德城市的建筑作为案例研究。第一个研究分析了住宅实例。本文分析了非住宅建筑,而宗教建筑将是即将进行的第三项研究的主题。发现的世俗非住宅建筑数量很少(只有12座),分为商业、公共和教育三大类。没有一种主导的或明确的伊斯兰风格被注意到,在我们的案例研究中,我们知道的七种当代建筑风格中只有三种被注意到:折衷主义(两种)、新伊斯兰主义(三种)和主导的现代简化伊斯兰主义(七种),然而我们发现每种风格都有很大的变化,在使用的词汇或细节上没有达成共识。该研究提出了在这些类型中使用伊斯兰风格的四个原因:期望的顾客/业主形象,设计意图,差异化的需要,怀旧和创造一个可销售的形象。值得注意的是,除了一个例外,在所有记录的例子中,伊斯兰风格或原则仅限于立面,而没有反映在布局中。除了外观细节外,只有一个例子在布局上呼应了伊斯兰城市模式。这种情况可以被描述为充满了折衷主义风格的混乱,从不同的时代和国家借鉴和重新诠释细节,没有明确的主导“风格”出现,甚至没有开始发展。没有特定的风格或细节占主导地位。这种折衷主义和混乱很可能是设计师对历史风格缺乏熟悉的反映,除了一些成功的解释。再一次,我们的分析表明,身份的缺乏
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信