Evaluation of Protein-Protein Interaction Management Systems

A. Rapti, E. Theodoridis, A. Tsakalidis
{"title":"Evaluation of Protein-Protein Interaction Management Systems","authors":"A. Rapti, E. Theodoridis, A. Tsakalidis","doi":"10.1109/DEXA.2013.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are very important for observing the behavior of known proteins in biological processes and in the study of many diseases. Currently, there is a number of PPI databases publicly available in the Web. In most cases, these datasets are managed by traditional relational database management systems (RDBMS) and they are shared as plain or XML files. A very useful approach would be the the unification of these separated data sources following the Semantic Web linked open data (LOD) paradigm, in order to complement and extend the existing knowledge of each data source. Semantic representation and storage of linked open datasets can be performed by many off-the-shelf systems modeling them as Resource Description Framework (RDF) models. RDF modeling, provides great flexibility for the linking, querying and mining of various PPI data sources. In this paper, we evaluate experimentally the interconnection and storage of various PPI data sources with off-the-shelf RDF storages. We examine the performance of such storages against traditional RDBMS in the context of PPI dataset management. Our main findings show that each one of the alternative storage methods, has its own advantages and disadvantages (in processing time and memory utilization) according to various types of queries.","PeriodicalId":428515,"journal":{"name":"2013 24th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications","volume":"461 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 24th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DEXA.2013.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are very important for observing the behavior of known proteins in biological processes and in the study of many diseases. Currently, there is a number of PPI databases publicly available in the Web. In most cases, these datasets are managed by traditional relational database management systems (RDBMS) and they are shared as plain or XML files. A very useful approach would be the the unification of these separated data sources following the Semantic Web linked open data (LOD) paradigm, in order to complement and extend the existing knowledge of each data source. Semantic representation and storage of linked open datasets can be performed by many off-the-shelf systems modeling them as Resource Description Framework (RDF) models. RDF modeling, provides great flexibility for the linking, querying and mining of various PPI data sources. In this paper, we evaluate experimentally the interconnection and storage of various PPI data sources with off-the-shelf RDF storages. We examine the performance of such storages against traditional RDBMS in the context of PPI dataset management. Our main findings show that each one of the alternative storage methods, has its own advantages and disadvantages (in processing time and memory utilization) according to various types of queries.
蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用管理系统的评价
蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用(PPIs)对于观察已知蛋白质在生物过程中的行为和许多疾病的研究非常重要。目前,Web上公开提供了许多PPI数据库。在大多数情况下,这些数据集由传统的关系数据库管理系统(RDBMS)管理,并作为普通文件或XML文件共享。一种非常有用的方法是按照语义Web链接开放数据(LOD)范式统一这些分离的数据源,以补充和扩展每个数据源的现有知识。链接开放数据集的语义表示和存储可以通过许多现成的系统来执行,这些系统将它们建模为资源描述框架(RDF)模型。RDF建模为各种PPI数据源的链接、查询和挖掘提供了极大的灵活性。在本文中,我们通过实验评估了各种PPI数据源与现成RDF存储的互连和存储。在PPI数据集管理的背景下,我们将这些存储与传统RDBMS的性能进行比较。我们的主要发现表明,根据不同类型的查询,每种替代存储方法都有自己的优点和缺点(在处理时间和内存利用率方面)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信