Similarities and differences between our small fcgs and larger FCGS

M. Fowler, J. Boydston, J. Ferguson, B. Lindeburg, A. Luginbill, T. Tutt
{"title":"Similarities and differences between our small fcgs and larger FCGS","authors":"M. Fowler, J. Boydston, J. Ferguson, B. Lindeburg, A. Luginbill, T. Tutt","doi":"10.1109/PPC.2003.1277739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After experimentally testing eight different designs of small explosive-driven, magnetic flux compression generators (FCGs), several similarities and differences have emerged when compared to larger FCGs. While the similarities were expected, the differences are rather surprising. The magnetic flux compression generators under consideration are small. Their armature diameters range from 0.95 cm to 2.54 cm. The similarities and differences are discussed using three figures of merit; alpha, magnetic flux efficiency, and energy gain. Experimental information is provided from tests of the small generators.","PeriodicalId":143385,"journal":{"name":"Digest of Technical Papers. PPC-2003. 14th IEEE International Pulsed Power Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37472)","volume":"267 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digest of Technical Papers. PPC-2003. 14th IEEE International Pulsed Power Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37472)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PPC.2003.1277739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

After experimentally testing eight different designs of small explosive-driven, magnetic flux compression generators (FCGs), several similarities and differences have emerged when compared to larger FCGs. While the similarities were expected, the differences are rather surprising. The magnetic flux compression generators under consideration are small. Their armature diameters range from 0.95 cm to 2.54 cm. The similarities and differences are discussed using three figures of merit; alpha, magnetic flux efficiency, and energy gain. Experimental information is provided from tests of the small generators.
小型fcgs与大型fcgs的异同
在实验测试了八种不同设计的小型炸药驱动磁通压缩发生器(FCGs)后,与大型FCGs相比,出现了一些相似之处和差异。虽然相似之处在意料之中,但差异却相当令人惊讶。所考虑的磁通量压缩发生器很小。它们的电枢直径从0.95厘米到2.54厘米不等。用三个功德数字来讨论两者的异同;α,磁通量效率和能量增益。实验资料来自小型发电机的试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信