“It’s not adequate, but otherwise they would not understand it”

Renata Šribar
{"title":"“It’s not adequate, but otherwise they would not understand it”","authors":"Renata Šribar","doi":"10.4312/as.24.3.39-55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper discusses the epistemic change in understanding the ‘sex’/gender dichotomy and its deconstruction; conceptual developments have not been adequately implemented in the basic categorical gender apparatus and its usage promoted by the European Commission’s studies and the integrated linguistic tools. The basic terms, sex and gender, are used interchangeably; even definitions where new concepts are introduced contradict each other. Mainstream gender policies have been slow in integrating new knowledge, although there is a trend to introduce a new gender category into the administration framework of EU states. The study aims at constituting the epistemic platform and a renewed gender related categorical apparatus to be used in the education sector. It resolves the inconsistencies present in various gender-focused studies by introducing the lowest common linguistic denominators supported by practical usage, EU political trends, and the contemporary epistemology of knowledge.","PeriodicalId":385363,"journal":{"name":"Andragoška spoznanja","volume":"73 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Andragoška spoznanja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4312/as.24.3.39-55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper discusses the epistemic change in understanding the ‘sex’/gender dichotomy and its deconstruction; conceptual developments have not been adequately implemented in the basic categorical gender apparatus and its usage promoted by the European Commission’s studies and the integrated linguistic tools. The basic terms, sex and gender, are used interchangeably; even definitions where new concepts are introduced contradict each other. Mainstream gender policies have been slow in integrating new knowledge, although there is a trend to introduce a new gender category into the administration framework of EU states. The study aims at constituting the epistemic platform and a renewed gender related categorical apparatus to be used in the education sector. It resolves the inconsistencies present in various gender-focused studies by introducing the lowest common linguistic denominators supported by practical usage, EU political trends, and the contemporary epistemology of knowledge.
“这是不够的,否则他们就不会理解了。”
本文讨论了理解“性”/性别二分法的认知变化及其解构;在欧洲委员会的研究和综合语言工具所促进的基本分类性别机构及其使用方面,概念发展尚未得到充分执行。基本术语“性”和“性别”可以互换使用;甚至引入新概念的定义也相互矛盾。主流性别政策在整合新知识方面进展缓慢,尽管有将新的性别类别引入欧盟国家行政框架的趋势。这项研究的目的是建立一个知识平台和一个新的与性别有关的分类工具,以便在教育部门使用。它通过引入由实际使用、欧盟政治趋势和当代知识认识论支持的最低共同语言分母,解决了各种以性别为重点的研究中存在的不一致之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信