Alpha-linolenic acid and cardiovascular disease.

F. Visioli, C. Galli
{"title":"Alpha-linolenic acid and cardiovascular disease.","authors":"F. Visioli, C. Galli","doi":"10.1093/ajcn/75.6.1121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Oomen et al (1) reported on the lack of association between -linolenic acid (ALA, 18:3n 3) consumption and the incidence of coronary artery disease in a 10-y follow-up. We believe that 2 major limitations of this study might have affected its outcome and led to the wrong conclusions. First, this study did not control for plasma concentrations of -linolenic acid; it is thus difficult to establish a causal relation between actual plasma concentrations of -linolenic acid—and of its elongation products eicosapentaenoic acid (22:5n 3) and docosahexaenoic acid (22:6n 3)—and the incidence of coronary artery disease. In contrast, the only clinical study of -linolenic acid carried out thus far, the Lyon Diet Heart Study (2, 3), proved that supplementation with adequate and controlled amounts of ALA increases plasma concentrations of this fatty acid, which was the only fatty acid significantly associated with an improved prognosis (3). Second, the amounts of ALA consumed by the subjects in the Zutphen Elderly Study were estimated only on the basis of food tables and dietary recollection data. Although foodcomposition tables may provide acceptable estimates of the intakes of major fatty acids, it is questionable whether such tables provide acceptable estimates of the intakes of minor fatty acids such as ALA that are present in amounts rarely exceeding 1 g/kg. Conversely, in the Lyon Diet Heart Study, patients were provided with known amounts of margarine enriched in ALA so that the daily intake of this fatty acid in the experimental and control groups was reliably determined to be 2 and 0.69 g, respectively. These differential intakes resulted in a 2-fold increase in the plasma concentrations of ALA in the experimental group (2). In conclusion, despite growing evidence that suggests health effects of ALA (4), we believe that because of the absence of reliable quantitative data, no definitive conclusions should be drawn regarding the health effects of ALA in terms of either plasma concentrations or daily intake.","PeriodicalId":315016,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of clinical nutrition","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of clinical nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/75.6.1121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Oomen et al (1) reported on the lack of association between -linolenic acid (ALA, 18:3n 3) consumption and the incidence of coronary artery disease in a 10-y follow-up. We believe that 2 major limitations of this study might have affected its outcome and led to the wrong conclusions. First, this study did not control for plasma concentrations of -linolenic acid; it is thus difficult to establish a causal relation between actual plasma concentrations of -linolenic acid—and of its elongation products eicosapentaenoic acid (22:5n 3) and docosahexaenoic acid (22:6n 3)—and the incidence of coronary artery disease. In contrast, the only clinical study of -linolenic acid carried out thus far, the Lyon Diet Heart Study (2, 3), proved that supplementation with adequate and controlled amounts of ALA increases plasma concentrations of this fatty acid, which was the only fatty acid significantly associated with an improved prognosis (3). Second, the amounts of ALA consumed by the subjects in the Zutphen Elderly Study were estimated only on the basis of food tables and dietary recollection data. Although foodcomposition tables may provide acceptable estimates of the intakes of major fatty acids, it is questionable whether such tables provide acceptable estimates of the intakes of minor fatty acids such as ALA that are present in amounts rarely exceeding 1 g/kg. Conversely, in the Lyon Diet Heart Study, patients were provided with known amounts of margarine enriched in ALA so that the daily intake of this fatty acid in the experimental and control groups was reliably determined to be 2 and 0.69 g, respectively. These differential intakes resulted in a 2-fold increase in the plasma concentrations of ALA in the experimental group (2). In conclusion, despite growing evidence that suggests health effects of ALA (4), we believe that because of the absence of reliable quantitative data, no definitive conclusions should be drawn regarding the health effects of ALA in terms of either plasma concentrations or daily intake.
-亚麻酸和心血管疾病
Oomen等人(1)在10年的随访中报道了-亚麻酸(ALA, 18:3n 3)的摄入与冠状动脉疾病的发病率之间缺乏关联。我们认为本研究的两个主要局限性可能影响了其结果并导致了错误的结论。首先,这项研究没有控制-亚麻酸的血浆浓度;因此,很难建立-亚麻酸及其延伸产物二十碳五烯酸(22:5n 3)和二十二碳六烯酸(22:6n 3)的实际血浆浓度与冠状动脉疾病发病率之间的因果关系。相比之下,迄今为止唯一一项关于-亚麻酸的临床研究,即里昂饮食心脏研究(2,3),证明补充足量和控制量的ALA会增加这种脂肪酸的血浆浓度,这是唯一一种与预后改善显著相关的脂肪酸(3)。其次,Zutphen老年研究中受试者摄入的ALA量仅根据食物表和饮食回忆数据进行估计。虽然食品成分表可能提供主要脂肪酸摄入量的可接受估计,但这些表是否提供少量脂肪酸(如ALA)的可接受估计是值得怀疑的,因为ALA的含量很少超过每公斤1克。相反,在里昂饮食心脏研究中,为患者提供了已知量的富含ALA的人造黄油,从而可靠地确定实验组和对照组每天摄入ALA的量分别为2 g和0.69 g。这些不同的摄入量导致实验组ALA的血浆浓度增加了2倍(2)。总之,尽管越来越多的证据表明ALA对健康有影响(4),但我们认为,由于缺乏可靠的定量数据,就血浆浓度或每日摄入量而言,ALA对健康的影响尚不能得出明确的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信