[Clinico-experimental testing for anti-inflammatory activity of external corticosteroids].

Berufs-Dermatosen Pub Date : 1977-04-01
E Böttger, E Koch, H Tronnier
{"title":"[Clinico-experimental testing for anti-inflammatory activity of external corticosteroids].","authors":"E Böttger,&nbsp;E Koch,&nbsp;H Tronnier","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical trials of the anti-inflammatory activity of corticosteroids for external use The influence on skin temperature of 4 corticoid-containing formulations and 3 steroid-free bases was tested in 9 subjects in whom no pathological skin changes were present but who were known to be sensitive to metal ions (chromium and nickel). The effect of the preparations on the healthy skin (vasoconstrictive effect) after a duration of action of 2 and 6 h was compared with the effect on skin sites treated subsequently with the contact allergens for a period of 24 h. In the procedure used the trial preparations were allowed to act for 2 and 6 h under occlusive dressing, or for 4 and 8 h, the dressing being removed for 2 h in each case. The allergization produced an increase in temperature at the skin surface which was influenced in various ways by the trial preparations. Whereas no statistically significant differences in the effect of the individual steroid topicals were found the healthy skin, in the evaluatin of the overall anti-inflammatory effect on the pathological skin processes, some distinct differences in effect were found. On comparing the results the following lowing order was obtained for the overall anti-inflammatory effect: 1. Fluprednylidene acetate 0.1% score 4.5, 2. Difluocortolone-valerate 0.1% score 8.5, 3. Fluocortolone trimethylacetate 0.25% + fluocortolone caproate 0.25% score 12, 4. Desoxymethasone 0.1% score 15, The steroid-free bases tested simultaneously did not exhibit clear effects on the temperature in the normal or inflamed skin. The results of the test procedure described are reproducible and can be evaluated by statistical method; the method thus seems appropriate for comparative studies of steroid-containing topicals. The special value in the procedure is the possibility of testing the effect of the preparations directly in a standardised inflammation model which is directly related to use in patients with inflammatory skin diseases, and of establishing in this way in which preparations the anti-inflammatory effect obtained exceeds the general effect common to all steroids.</p>","PeriodicalId":8796,"journal":{"name":"Berufs-Dermatosen","volume":"25 2","pages":"53-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1977-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berufs-Dermatosen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical trials of the anti-inflammatory activity of corticosteroids for external use The influence on skin temperature of 4 corticoid-containing formulations and 3 steroid-free bases was tested in 9 subjects in whom no pathological skin changes were present but who were known to be sensitive to metal ions (chromium and nickel). The effect of the preparations on the healthy skin (vasoconstrictive effect) after a duration of action of 2 and 6 h was compared with the effect on skin sites treated subsequently with the contact allergens for a period of 24 h. In the procedure used the trial preparations were allowed to act for 2 and 6 h under occlusive dressing, or for 4 and 8 h, the dressing being removed for 2 h in each case. The allergization produced an increase in temperature at the skin surface which was influenced in various ways by the trial preparations. Whereas no statistically significant differences in the effect of the individual steroid topicals were found the healthy skin, in the evaluatin of the overall anti-inflammatory effect on the pathological skin processes, some distinct differences in effect were found. On comparing the results the following lowing order was obtained for the overall anti-inflammatory effect: 1. Fluprednylidene acetate 0.1% score 4.5, 2. Difluocortolone-valerate 0.1% score 8.5, 3. Fluocortolone trimethylacetate 0.25% + fluocortolone caproate 0.25% score 12, 4. Desoxymethasone 0.1% score 15, The steroid-free bases tested simultaneously did not exhibit clear effects on the temperature in the normal or inflamed skin. The results of the test procedure described are reproducible and can be evaluated by statistical method; the method thus seems appropriate for comparative studies of steroid-containing topicals. The special value in the procedure is the possibility of testing the effect of the preparations directly in a standardised inflammation model which is directly related to use in patients with inflammatory skin diseases, and of establishing in this way in which preparations the anti-inflammatory effect obtained exceeds the general effect common to all steroids.

[外用皮质类固醇抗炎活性的临床实验测试]。
外用皮质类固醇抗炎活性的临床试验研究了4种含皮质类固醇制剂和3种不含类固醇碱对皮肤温度的影响,试验对象为9名皮肤无病理性变化但已知对金属离子(铬和镍)敏感的受试者。将制剂在作用2和6小时后对健康皮肤的影响(血管收缩作用)与随后用接触性过敏原治疗24小时后对皮肤部位的影响进行比较。在使用的程序中,试验制剂允许在闭塞敷料下作用2和6小时,或4和8小时,每种情况下敷料被去除2小时。过敏产生皮肤表面温度的升高,这在不同方面受到试验制剂的影响。虽然在健康皮肤中发现单个类固醇外用药物的效果没有统计学意义上的差异,但在评估对病理皮肤过程的总体抗炎效果时,发现了一些明显的差异。通过对实验结果的比较,得出其整体抗炎效果的排序为:醋酸氟丙二烯0.1%评分4.5,2分。戊酸二氟柯洛酮0.1%评分8.5,3分。0.25%三甲基醋酸氟科托酮+ 0.25%己酸氟科托酮评分12,4。去氧米松0.1%得分15,同时测试的无类固醇碱对正常或发炎皮肤的温度没有明显影响。所描述的测试程序的结果是可重复的,可以用统计方法进行评估;因此,该方法似乎适合于含类固醇外用药物的比较研究。该程序的特殊价值在于可以直接在与炎症性皮肤病患者使用直接相关的标准化炎症模型中测试制剂的效果,并以这种方式确定所获得的制剂的抗炎效果超过所有类固醇的一般效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信