Eliciting partial occlusions in the drawings of 4- and 5-year-olds

C. Arrowsmith, M. Cox, K. Eames
{"title":"Eliciting partial occlusions in the drawings of 4- and 5-year-olds","authors":"C. Arrowsmith, M. Cox, K. Eames","doi":"10.1111/J.2044-835X.1994.TB00657.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When asked to depict a partially occluded scene, children as young as 4 or 5 years normally draw two complete and separate objects (intellectual realism). The man-wall hiding task is one exception, in which these children make more attempts at visual realism. Four- and 5-year-olds were given a standard task, followed by a hiding task and then the standard task again. Both age groups drew visually realistic pictures in the hiding task. The 5-year-olds but not the 4-year-olds were able to generalize their attempts at visual realism to their second attempt at the standard task. A second group of children who received the standard task, followed by another version of the standard task and then the standard task again, did not draw in a visually realistic way. In order to disentangle an explanation in terms of the notion of hiding from one based on the dissimilarity of the two objects in the hiding task, a third group of children received a dissimilar scene (but with no hiding component) between the two standard tasks. Most of these children did not draw in a visually realistic way, indicating that the notion of hiding conveyed in the hiding task is the main explanation for its success in eliciting visually realistic responses.","PeriodicalId":224518,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Development Psychology","volume":"8 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Development Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.2044-835X.1994.TB00657.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

When asked to depict a partially occluded scene, children as young as 4 or 5 years normally draw two complete and separate objects (intellectual realism). The man-wall hiding task is one exception, in which these children make more attempts at visual realism. Four- and 5-year-olds were given a standard task, followed by a hiding task and then the standard task again. Both age groups drew visually realistic pictures in the hiding task. The 5-year-olds but not the 4-year-olds were able to generalize their attempts at visual realism to their second attempt at the standard task. A second group of children who received the standard task, followed by another version of the standard task and then the standard task again, did not draw in a visually realistic way. In order to disentangle an explanation in terms of the notion of hiding from one based on the dissimilarity of the two objects in the hiding task, a third group of children received a dissimilar scene (but with no hiding component) between the two standard tasks. Most of these children did not draw in a visually realistic way, indicating that the notion of hiding conveyed in the hiding task is the main explanation for its success in eliciting visually realistic responses.
引起4- 5岁儿童的部分咬合
当被要求描绘一个部分遮挡的场景时,4或5岁的孩子通常会画两个完整而独立的物体(智力现实主义)。隐藏人墙的任务是一个例外,在这个任务中,这些孩子们更多地尝试视觉现实主义。四岁和五岁的孩子先完成一项标准任务,然后是隐藏任务,然后再完成一项标准任务。两个年龄组在隐藏任务中都画出了视觉逼真的图画。5岁的孩子,而不是4岁的孩子能够将他们对视觉现实主义的尝试推广到他们对标准任务的第二次尝试中。第二组孩子接受了标准任务,然后是另一个版本的标准任务,然后是另一个版本的标准任务,他们没有以视觉逼真的方式画画。为了根据隐藏任务中两个物体的不相似性来解释隐藏的概念,第三组儿童在两个标准任务之间接受了一个不同的场景(但没有隐藏成分)。这些孩子中的大多数没有以视觉逼真的方式画画,这表明隐藏任务中传达的隐藏概念是其成功引发视觉逼真反应的主要解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信