A Synthesis of Morphology Interventions and Effects on Reading Outcomes for Students in Grades K–12

Deborah K. Reed
{"title":"A Synthesis of Morphology Interventions and Effects on Reading Outcomes for Students in Grades K–12","authors":"Deborah K. Reed","doi":"10.1111/J.1540-5826.2007.00261.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article synthesized the morphology intervention studies conducted in English with students in kindergarten through 12th grade between 1986 and 2006. Seven studies were identified as focusing primarily on morphology instruction, including roots and affixes, and measuring one or more reading-related outcomes (e.g., word identification, spelling, vocabulary, reading comprehension). Of those studies meeting the criteria, three studies were focused on word identification, three were focused on vocabulary acquisition, and one was focused on spelling. Although there was a wide range in effect sizes computed for the various outcome measures (−.93 to 9.13), findings indicated that stronger effects were associated with root word instruction (as opposed to affixes alone) and with morphology instruction that targeted students' reading developmental level in an age of acquisition pattern. In addition, results suggested that morphology could successfully be combined with training in other skills without adding instructional time.","PeriodicalId":158079,"journal":{"name":"Learning Disabilities Research and Practice","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"164","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Disabilities Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1540-5826.2007.00261.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 164

Abstract

This article synthesized the morphology intervention studies conducted in English with students in kindergarten through 12th grade between 1986 and 2006. Seven studies were identified as focusing primarily on morphology instruction, including roots and affixes, and measuring one or more reading-related outcomes (e.g., word identification, spelling, vocabulary, reading comprehension). Of those studies meeting the criteria, three studies were focused on word identification, three were focused on vocabulary acquisition, and one was focused on spelling. Although there was a wide range in effect sizes computed for the various outcome measures (−.93 to 9.13), findings indicated that stronger effects were associated with root word instruction (as opposed to affixes alone) and with morphology instruction that targeted students' reading developmental level in an age of acquisition pattern. In addition, results suggested that morphology could successfully be combined with training in other skills without adding instructional time.
形态干预对K-12年级学生阅读成绩的综合影响
本文综合了1986年至2006年对幼儿园至12年级学生进行的英语形态学干预研究。有7项研究主要关注词法教学,包括词根和词缀,并测量一个或多个与阅读相关的结果(如单词识别、拼写、词汇、阅读理解)。在这些符合标准的研究中,三个研究集中在单词识别上,三个研究集中在词汇习得上,一个研究集中在拼写上。尽管各种结果测量值计算的效应值范围很广(−。93 ~ 9.13)的研究结果表明,词根教学(相对于词缀教学)和词法教学的效果更强,而词法教学针对的是处于习得阶段的学生的阅读发展水平。此外,结果表明形态学可以成功地与其他技能的训练相结合,而不增加教学时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书