[Cardiovascular effects produced by prophylactic digitalization during introduction of anaesthesia (author's transl)].

R Köppen, K Köhne, J Busse, I Hosselmann, E Klaschik, F Simons
{"title":"[Cardiovascular effects produced by prophylactic digitalization during introduction of anaesthesia (author's transl)].","authors":"R Köppen,&nbsp;K Köhne,&nbsp;J Busse,&nbsp;I Hosselmann,&nbsp;E Klaschik,&nbsp;F Simons","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The narrow field of non-controversial indications concerning the application of digitalis glycosides is pointed out. Problems of routine digitalization of older patients not suffering from cardiac insuffiency are discussed with special regard to preparing them for operations. Up to now, from the viewpoint of anaesthesiologists no benefits of prophylactic digitalization have been found. In a retrospective computerized study, clinical hemodynamic parameters during introduction of anaesthesia have been investigated by means of anaesthetic data recorded during three years. Nondigitalized patients older than fifty years showed satisfactory cardiac functions, whereas prophylactically digitalized patients--compared with the control group--have been treated with plasma expanders earlier and at a double rate. Furthermore, higher heart frequencies and greater tendency to arrythmias were observed. Consequently, prophylactic digitalization cannot be recommended in general.</p>","PeriodicalId":76342,"journal":{"name":"Praktische Anasthesie, Wiederbelebung und Intensivtherapie","volume":"13 5","pages":"409-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Praktische Anasthesie, Wiederbelebung und Intensivtherapie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The narrow field of non-controversial indications concerning the application of digitalis glycosides is pointed out. Problems of routine digitalization of older patients not suffering from cardiac insuffiency are discussed with special regard to preparing them for operations. Up to now, from the viewpoint of anaesthesiologists no benefits of prophylactic digitalization have been found. In a retrospective computerized study, clinical hemodynamic parameters during introduction of anaesthesia have been investigated by means of anaesthetic data recorded during three years. Nondigitalized patients older than fifty years showed satisfactory cardiac functions, whereas prophylactically digitalized patients--compared with the control group--have been treated with plasma expanders earlier and at a double rate. Furthermore, higher heart frequencies and greater tendency to arrythmias were observed. Consequently, prophylactic digitalization cannot be recommended in general.

[麻醉引入期间预防性数字化对心血管的影响(作者简介)]。
指出了洋地黄苷应用中无争议适应症的狭窄领域。讨论了非心功能不全老年患者的常规数字化问题,特别是关于准备他们的手术。到目前为止,从麻醉医师的角度来看,预防性数字化还没有发现任何好处。在一项回顾性计算机研究中,临床血流动力学参数在引入麻醉期间进行了调查,通过麻醉数据记录了三年。50岁以上的非数字化患者显示出满意的心功能,而预防性数字化患者——与对照组相比——更早接受了血浆扩张器治疗,治疗率是对照组的两倍。此外,观察到更高的心脏频率和更大的心律失常倾向。因此,预防性数字化通常不被推荐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信