[Comparison of the mean-term physiological effects of cis or trans docosenoic acids in the rat. I. Digestibility of fatty acids. Effects on growth, organ weights and heart histology].
{"title":"[Comparison of the mean-term physiological effects of cis or trans docosenoic acids in the rat. I. Digestibility of fatty acids. Effects on growth, organ weights and heart histology].","authors":"P O Astorg, R Levillain","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The mean-term physiological effects of brassidic acid (n-9, trans docosenoic acid) and of erucic acid (n-9, cis docosenoic acid) have been compared to those of their C 18 homologues, elaidic and oleic acid, in a 2(3) factorial experiment; the 3 tested factors are: 1) the chain length of the dietary monoenes (C 22:1 vs. C 18:1), 2) the geometrical configuration of their double bond (trans vs. cis) and 3) the dietary level of linoleic acid (30% vs. 1,7% of dietary fatty acids). Wistar weanling rats have been fed for 16 weeks semi-synthetic diets containing 15% of lipids by weight, in which the fatty acids under study (brassidic, erucic elaidic) ranged to 40%. Although caution has been taken to optimize the digestibility of brassidic acid (interesterification of the lipid mixture, reduced level of calcium in the diet, addition of monoglycerides), it remains lower that of erucic acid. However, because of different levels of food consumption, the absorbed amounts of the two isomers are about the same. With a high dietary supply of linoleic acid, the dietary monoenes (C 22:1 or C 18:1), cis or trans) do not induce great changes in the weight gain of the rats, when adjusted to food consumption; linoleic acid subdeficiency lowers this adjusted weight gain, except when the diet contains oleic acid as the only monoene. These effects do not parallel those observed on the absolute growth of the rats. The trans monoenes, and to a lesser extent, erucic acid, induce an increase of liver weight (adjusted to body weight). The light microscopic histological study of the heart does not reveal any difference between the brassidic acid fed-rats and those fed the C 18:1 monoenes (elaidic, oleic). In contrast, erucic acid induces definite lesions of the myocardium. The dietary level of linoleic acid has little influence on the incidence and the severity of the lesions. The effects of these dietary fatty acids on the lipid contents and fatty acid compositions of different organs will be reported in a second paper.</p>","PeriodicalId":75504,"journal":{"name":"Annales de la nutrition et de l'alimentation","volume":"33 5","pages":"643-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1979-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales de la nutrition et de l'alimentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The mean-term physiological effects of brassidic acid (n-9, trans docosenoic acid) and of erucic acid (n-9, cis docosenoic acid) have been compared to those of their C 18 homologues, elaidic and oleic acid, in a 2(3) factorial experiment; the 3 tested factors are: 1) the chain length of the dietary monoenes (C 22:1 vs. C 18:1), 2) the geometrical configuration of their double bond (trans vs. cis) and 3) the dietary level of linoleic acid (30% vs. 1,7% of dietary fatty acids). Wistar weanling rats have been fed for 16 weeks semi-synthetic diets containing 15% of lipids by weight, in which the fatty acids under study (brassidic, erucic elaidic) ranged to 40%. Although caution has been taken to optimize the digestibility of brassidic acid (interesterification of the lipid mixture, reduced level of calcium in the diet, addition of monoglycerides), it remains lower that of erucic acid. However, because of different levels of food consumption, the absorbed amounts of the two isomers are about the same. With a high dietary supply of linoleic acid, the dietary monoenes (C 22:1 or C 18:1), cis or trans) do not induce great changes in the weight gain of the rats, when adjusted to food consumption; linoleic acid subdeficiency lowers this adjusted weight gain, except when the diet contains oleic acid as the only monoene. These effects do not parallel those observed on the absolute growth of the rats. The trans monoenes, and to a lesser extent, erucic acid, induce an increase of liver weight (adjusted to body weight). The light microscopic histological study of the heart does not reveal any difference between the brassidic acid fed-rats and those fed the C 18:1 monoenes (elaidic, oleic). In contrast, erucic acid induces definite lesions of the myocardium. The dietary level of linoleic acid has little influence on the incidence and the severity of the lesions. The effects of these dietary fatty acids on the lipid contents and fatty acid compositions of different organs will be reported in a second paper.
在2(3)因子实验中,比较了十字花科酸(n-9,反式二十二烯酸)和芥酸(n-9,顺式二十二烯酸)与其c18同源物油酸和油酸的平均生理效应;测试的3个因素是:1)膳食中单烯的链长(C 22:1 vs C 18:1), 2)其双键的几何构型(反式vs顺式)和3)膳食中亚油酸的含量(30% vs. 1.7%的膳食脂肪酸)。Wistar断奶大鼠饲喂了16周的半合成饲料,饲料中脂肪含量为体重的15%,其中所研究的脂肪酸(花椰菜、芥菜)含量为40%。尽管已采取谨慎措施优化花蓝酸的消化率(脂质混合物的酯化、降低日粮中钙的水平、添加单甘油酯),但其消化率仍低于芥酸。然而,由于食物摄入量的不同,两种异构体的吸收量大致相同。高亚油酸日粮中单烯(c22:1或c18:1),顺式或反式)与食物消耗量相适应时,不会引起大鼠体重增加的大变化;亚油酸亚缺乏会降低这种调整后的体重增加,除非饮食中含有油酸作为唯一的单烯。这些影响与在大鼠的绝对生长上观察到的不同。反式单烯,在较小程度上,芥酸,诱导肝脏重量的增加(调整到体重)。心脏的光镜组织学研究没有发现用花青酸喂养的大鼠和用c18:1单烯(油酸、油酸)喂养的大鼠之间有任何差异。相反,芥酸引起心肌的明确损害。饮食中亚油酸水平对病变的发生率和严重程度影响不大。这些膳食脂肪酸对不同器官脂肪含量和脂肪酸组成的影响将在第二篇论文中报道。