Moral Consciousness in Oronzo Suma, Brentano’s Last Pupil

M. Sinatra
{"title":"Moral Consciousness in Oronzo Suma, Brentano’s Last Pupil","authors":"M. Sinatra","doi":"10.53841/bpshpp.2007.9.2.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On the back of a photo given by F. Brentano to O. Suma in 1912 there was a dedication in verse, a testimony to the close friendship which bound the two. The latter was an Italian philosopher who followed Brentano ‘s teaching in Florence in the second decade of the 20thcentury, and after his death, retiredfrom all academic life having been largely unexplored.The current paper is a reconstruction of Suma’s idea of the rules governing moral behaviour. In addition, there is little common ground as regards moral philosophy among Brentano’s followers.As a background to a comparison between Brentano’s and Jhering’s ethical theses on justice, Suma’s thought is analysed in terms of its connections not only with the Brentanian views but also with F. De Sarlo’s Florentine school. The points at issue were the nature of knowledge and consciousness, and reflection on both the subject’s ways of behaving relative to the object and the correlate psychic determinations, like judgements.This analysis of Suma’s contribution includes a consideration of the attempts made between 1800 and 1900 to find guidelines different from the imperatives of Kantian reason.","PeriodicalId":123600,"journal":{"name":"History & Philosophy of Psychology","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History & Philosophy of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpshpp.2007.9.2.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On the back of a photo given by F. Brentano to O. Suma in 1912 there was a dedication in verse, a testimony to the close friendship which bound the two. The latter was an Italian philosopher who followed Brentano ‘s teaching in Florence in the second decade of the 20thcentury, and after his death, retiredfrom all academic life having been largely unexplored.The current paper is a reconstruction of Suma’s idea of the rules governing moral behaviour. In addition, there is little common ground as regards moral philosophy among Brentano’s followers.As a background to a comparison between Brentano’s and Jhering’s ethical theses on justice, Suma’s thought is analysed in terms of its connections not only with the Brentanian views but also with F. De Sarlo’s Florentine school. The points at issue were the nature of knowledge and consciousness, and reflection on both the subject’s ways of behaving relative to the object and the correlate psychic determinations, like judgements.This analysis of Suma’s contribution includes a consideration of the attempts made between 1800 and 1900 to find guidelines different from the imperatives of Kantian reason.
布伦塔诺最后一个学生奥伦佐·苏马的道德意识
1912年,F.布伦塔诺送给O.苏马的一张照片的背面有一首诗,这是两人亲密友谊的见证。后者是一位意大利哲学家,他在20世纪的第二个十年在佛罗伦萨追随布伦塔诺的教诲,在他去世后,从所有的学术生活中退休,大部分都没有被探索过。这篇论文是对苏马关于道德行为规则的观点的重建。此外,布伦塔诺的追随者在道德哲学方面几乎没有共同点。作为比较布伦塔诺和耶林关于正义的伦理论文的背景,本文不仅分析了苏马思想与布伦塔诺观点的联系,还分析了苏马思想与德萨洛佛罗伦萨学派的联系。争论的焦点是知识和意识的本质,以及对主体相对于客体的行为方式和相关的心理决定(如判断)的反思。这种对苏马贡献的分析包括对1800年至1900年间寻找不同于康德理性法则的指导方针的尝试的考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信