Professionalisation through further education: An international comparison of non-formal education programmes for adult educators

Jessica Kleinschmidt, Jörg Schwarz, Kadine Lucas, Reinis Upenieks, Adeniyi Adaramola
{"title":"Professionalisation through further education: An international comparison of non-formal education programmes for adult educators","authors":"Jessica Kleinschmidt, Jörg Schwarz, Kadine Lucas, Reinis Upenieks, Adeniyi Adaramola","doi":"10.5937/andstud2002063k","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Professionalism is a core topic in international discourse on adult education. Its importance is due not least to the need for professional self-assurance given the heterogeneity of the field of adult education, which is characterised not only by a wide range of working conditions, employment forms and responsibilities but also by the different qualifications and professional backgrounds of adult educators. Therefore, further education programmes for adult educators could be one important pillar in the professionalisation of adult education. At the same time, however, heterogeneous personnel structures make the seemingly simple question of further education for adult educators increasingly complex. While at the international level there is particular emphasis on professionalisation by means of academic degree programmes, the focus of the present paper is on non-formal further education for adult educators. It compares similarities and differences using country-specific examples of non-formal further education programmes for adult educators and seeks to explain them. The results are obtained using an international comparative research methodology. The cases (non-formal programmes) from Latvia, Brazil, Germany and Nigeria are examined by focusing on their target groups, structures, content and aims. The degree to which they are embedded in specific organisational and institutional structures and (national) policies also plays a role. The starting point for a critical reflection is the question: How can non-formal further education programmes contribute to the individual professionalisation of adult educators?","PeriodicalId":229688,"journal":{"name":"Andragoske studije","volume":"07 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Andragoske studije","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/andstud2002063k","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Professionalism is a core topic in international discourse on adult education. Its importance is due not least to the need for professional self-assurance given the heterogeneity of the field of adult education, which is characterised not only by a wide range of working conditions, employment forms and responsibilities but also by the different qualifications and professional backgrounds of adult educators. Therefore, further education programmes for adult educators could be one important pillar in the professionalisation of adult education. At the same time, however, heterogeneous personnel structures make the seemingly simple question of further education for adult educators increasingly complex. While at the international level there is particular emphasis on professionalisation by means of academic degree programmes, the focus of the present paper is on non-formal further education for adult educators. It compares similarities and differences using country-specific examples of non-formal further education programmes for adult educators and seeks to explain them. The results are obtained using an international comparative research methodology. The cases (non-formal programmes) from Latvia, Brazil, Germany and Nigeria are examined by focusing on their target groups, structures, content and aims. The degree to which they are embedded in specific organisational and institutional structures and (national) policies also plays a role. The starting point for a critical reflection is the question: How can non-formal further education programmes contribute to the individual professionalisation of adult educators?
通过继续教育实现专业化:成人教育工作者非正规教育计划的国际比较
职业化是国际成人教育讨论的核心话题。鉴于成人教育领域的多样性,其特点不仅是工作条件、就业形式和责任范围广泛,而且成人教育工作者的资格和专业背景也各不相同,因此它的重要性尤其在于需要专业自信。因此,成人教育工作者的继续教育方案可以成为成人教育专业化的一个重要支柱。然而,与此同时,多样化的人才结构使成人教育工作者继续教育这个看似简单的问题变得越来越复杂。虽然在国际一级特别强调通过学术学位课程实现专业化,但本文的重点是成人教育工作者的非正规继续教育。它使用针对成人教育工作者的非正规继续教育方案的具体国家例子比较异同,并试图解释它们。研究结果采用国际比较研究方法得出。对来自拉脱维亚、巴西、德国和尼日利亚的案例(非正式方案)进行审查,重点关注其目标群体、结构、内容和目标。它们在具体的组织和体制结构以及(国家)政策中的嵌入程度也起着作用。批判性反思的出发点是这样一个问题:非正规继续教育课程如何有助于成人教育工作者的个人专业化?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信