Multivectorness as a Way Out of the Impasse of Strategic Vulnerability

E. Ponomareva
{"title":"Multivectorness as a Way Out of the Impasse of Strategic Vulnerability","authors":"E. Ponomareva","doi":"10.18485/iipe_balkans_rssc.2020.ch11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The Balkans remains a zone of strategic vulnerability aggravated by the struggle of major global political actors for Serbia, a country that has long been trying to preserve a relative political and military neutrality. Despite serious upheavals at the turn of the 20 th and 21 st centuries, including the dissolution of Yugoslavia, the bombings by NATO, the “divorce” with Montenegro and the creation of the “Republic of Kosovo,” Belgrade has been managing to balance between two major poles of attraction – the EU-NATO and Russia, which fits into the concept of multivectorness. Given all geographic, historical, cultural and economic determinism of European integration, Serbia’s final choice of the European vector is complicated by two sensitive and problematic matters – the need to recognize the “Republic of Kosovo” and the inclusion in the military and political framework of NATO. Moreover, the first issue entails substantial political and civilizational risks, both for the Western Balkans and the European Union as a whole, let alone a dramatic internal split of the Serbian society over the possible recognition of the newly formed independent Albanian entity. On the other hand, Russia, which has unique image opportunities and, unlike the EU, does not aspire to play the role of an “empire by invitation”, is a natural counterbalance to the Euro-Atlantic pressure on Belgrade. The situation is further complicated by the fact that the existing historical dualism of multivectorness is being disrupted by the emergence of China, a new player in the Balkans. By solely economic levers, Beijing has been solving the strategic problems of penetration into European markets and simultaneously smoothly, but sequentially superseding Russia as Serbia’s main alternative to the West. The article analyzes the tactic employed by Chinese companies and concludes that there has been a growing concealed competition between the People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation for the place of the main non-European actor not only in Serbia but in the Balkans as a whole. In such circumstances, by preserving the policy of multivectorness (despite all criticism of the concept), Serbia may find a way out of the impasse of strategic vulnerability, i.e., to achieve a if only short-term, of the status quo of political,","PeriodicalId":139511,"journal":{"name":"Security Challenges and the Place of the Balkans and Serbia","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Security Challenges and the Place of the Balkans and Serbia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18485/iipe_balkans_rssc.2020.ch11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: The Balkans remains a zone of strategic vulnerability aggravated by the struggle of major global political actors for Serbia, a country that has long been trying to preserve a relative political and military neutrality. Despite serious upheavals at the turn of the 20 th and 21 st centuries, including the dissolution of Yugoslavia, the bombings by NATO, the “divorce” with Montenegro and the creation of the “Republic of Kosovo,” Belgrade has been managing to balance between two major poles of attraction – the EU-NATO and Russia, which fits into the concept of multivectorness. Given all geographic, historical, cultural and economic determinism of European integration, Serbia’s final choice of the European vector is complicated by two sensitive and problematic matters – the need to recognize the “Republic of Kosovo” and the inclusion in the military and political framework of NATO. Moreover, the first issue entails substantial political and civilizational risks, both for the Western Balkans and the European Union as a whole, let alone a dramatic internal split of the Serbian society over the possible recognition of the newly formed independent Albanian entity. On the other hand, Russia, which has unique image opportunities and, unlike the EU, does not aspire to play the role of an “empire by invitation”, is a natural counterbalance to the Euro-Atlantic pressure on Belgrade. The situation is further complicated by the fact that the existing historical dualism of multivectorness is being disrupted by the emergence of China, a new player in the Balkans. By solely economic levers, Beijing has been solving the strategic problems of penetration into European markets and simultaneously smoothly, but sequentially superseding Russia as Serbia’s main alternative to the West. The article analyzes the tactic employed by Chinese companies and concludes that there has been a growing concealed competition between the People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation for the place of the main non-European actor not only in Serbia but in the Balkans as a whole. In such circumstances, by preserving the policy of multivectorness (despite all criticism of the concept), Serbia may find a way out of the impasse of strategic vulnerability, i.e., to achieve a if only short-term, of the status quo of political,
多向量是走出战略脆弱性僵局的一条出路
巴尔干地区仍然是一个战略脆弱的地区,对塞尔维亚来说,全球主要政治行动者的斗争加剧了这个地区的脆弱性,塞尔维亚长期以来一直试图保持相对的政治和军事中立。尽管在20世纪和21世纪之交发生了严重的动荡,包括南斯拉夫的解体、北约的轰炸、与黑山的“离婚”以及“科索沃共和国”的成立,贝尔格莱德一直设法在两个主要的吸引力两极之间保持平衡——欧盟-北约和俄罗斯,这符合多矢量的概念。考虑到欧洲一体化的所有地理、历史、文化和经济决定因素,塞尔维亚对欧洲载体的最终选择因两个敏感和有问题的问题而复杂化- -必须承认“科索沃共和国”和纳入北约的军事和政治框架。此外,第一个问题对西巴尔干地区和整个欧洲联盟都带来重大的政治和文明风险,更不用说塞尔维亚社会在可能承认新成立的独立阿尔巴尼亚实体的问题上发生戏剧性的内部分裂了。另一方面,俄罗斯拥有独特的形象机会,而且与欧盟不同,它并不渴望扮演“邀请帝国”的角色,因此是欧洲-大西洋对贝尔格莱德施加压力的天然平衡。由于中国这个巴尔干地区的新参与者的出现,现有的多向量的历史二元论正在被打破,这一事实使情况进一步复杂化。仅仅通过经济杠杆,北京已经解决了渗透欧洲市场的战略问题,同时顺利地取代了俄罗斯,成为塞尔维亚在西方之外的主要选择。本文分析了中国公司所采用的策略,并得出结论,中华人民共和国和俄罗斯联邦之间不仅在塞尔维亚,而且在整个巴尔干地区,为争夺主要的非欧洲参与者的地位,进行了越来越隐蔽的竞争。在这种情况下,通过保持多方向政策(尽管对这一概念有各种批评),塞尔维亚可能找到摆脱战略脆弱性僵局的办法,即实现政治、
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信