Morphometric indicators for selection of dual endobronchial tube in thoracic anesthesiology

O. Usenko, A. Sydiuk, O. Sydiuk, A. Klimas, G. Savenko, O. Teslia
{"title":"Morphometric indicators for selection of dual endobronchial tube in thoracic anesthesiology","authors":"O. Usenko, A. Sydiuk, O. Sydiuk, A. Klimas, G. Savenko, O. Teslia","doi":"10.31393/morphology-journal-2022-28(1)-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the purpose of single-lung ventilation, various methods of lung isolation are used in the world, which is a prerequisite for many thoracic, cardiac and esophageal surgeries. Numerous studies have reported various methods for determining the optimal suitability between the diameter of the tube and the diameter of the left main bronchus for adequate ventilation and gas exchange during operations on the thoracic cavity. However, there is no consensus among anesthesiologists on the choice of tube size for effective lung ventilation and isolation. We have developed a new mathematical formula for determining the appropriate size of the left bilateral luminal endobronchial tube (LDT). The aim of the study was to determine the effectiveness of the developed standardized mathematical formula for determining the appropriate size of LDT for use in thoracic anesthesiology. The study was performed on 192 patients with diseases of the thoracic cavity (esophagus, lungs, mediastinum), operated on in the thoracoabdominal department of the Shalimov National Institute of Surgery and Tranplantology. A retrospective comparison group – 96 patients after thoracic surgery, which used the choice of LDT size according to the well-known Slinger method “according to the patient’s height”. The study group consisted of 96 patients after thoracic surgery, in which the choice of the size of the bifurcated endobronchial tube was used according to the developed method (according to the formula that evaluates morphometric indicators of height, sex and diameter of the left main bronchus). The application of the proposed method reduces (p = 0.001) the risk of pulmonary complications, HR = 0.39 (95 % CI 0.22-0.70) compared to traditional methods. The risk decreased 2.5 times.","PeriodicalId":364875,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Morphology","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports of Morphology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31393/morphology-journal-2022-28(1)-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For the purpose of single-lung ventilation, various methods of lung isolation are used in the world, which is a prerequisite for many thoracic, cardiac and esophageal surgeries. Numerous studies have reported various methods for determining the optimal suitability between the diameter of the tube and the diameter of the left main bronchus for adequate ventilation and gas exchange during operations on the thoracic cavity. However, there is no consensus among anesthesiologists on the choice of tube size for effective lung ventilation and isolation. We have developed a new mathematical formula for determining the appropriate size of the left bilateral luminal endobronchial tube (LDT). The aim of the study was to determine the effectiveness of the developed standardized mathematical formula for determining the appropriate size of LDT for use in thoracic anesthesiology. The study was performed on 192 patients with diseases of the thoracic cavity (esophagus, lungs, mediastinum), operated on in the thoracoabdominal department of the Shalimov National Institute of Surgery and Tranplantology. A retrospective comparison group – 96 patients after thoracic surgery, which used the choice of LDT size according to the well-known Slinger method “according to the patient’s height”. The study group consisted of 96 patients after thoracic surgery, in which the choice of the size of the bifurcated endobronchial tube was used according to the developed method (according to the formula that evaluates morphometric indicators of height, sex and diameter of the left main bronchus). The application of the proposed method reduces (p = 0.001) the risk of pulmonary complications, HR = 0.39 (95 % CI 0.22-0.70) compared to traditional methods. The risk decreased 2.5 times.
胸外科双支气管内管选择的形态学指标
为了达到单肺通气的目的,世界上采用了各种各样的肺隔离方法,这是许多胸外科、心脏外科和食管外科手术的先决条件。大量的研究报道了各种方法来确定导管直径和左主支气管直径之间的最佳适宜性,以便在胸腔手术中充分通气和气体交换。然而,麻醉医师在选择有效的肺通气和隔离管的尺寸上没有达成共识。我们已经开发了一个新的数学公式来确定适当的大小左双侧腔内支气管管(LDT)。该研究的目的是确定开发的标准化数学公式的有效性,以确定胸麻醉学中使用的LDT的适当大小。研究对象为192名在沙利莫夫国家外科和移植研究所胸腹科接受手术的胸腔疾病(食道、肺、纵隔)患者。回顾性对照组- 96例胸外科术后患者,采用著名的Slinger法“根据患者身高”选择LDT大小。研究组为96例胸外科术后患者,根据制定的方法(根据左主支气管高度、性别、直径等形态计量指标的评估公式)选择支气管分叉管的大小。与传统方法相比,应用该方法可降低肺部并发症的风险(p = 0.001), HR = 0.39 (95% CI 0.22-0.70)。患病风险降低了2.5倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信