Intelligent Software Bug Prediction: An Empirical Approach

MD. Ariyan Jahangir, MD. Abtahi Tajwar, Waythin Marma, MD. Siyamul Islam
{"title":"Intelligent Software Bug Prediction: An Empirical Approach","authors":"MD. Ariyan Jahangir, MD. Abtahi Tajwar, Waythin Marma, MD. Siyamul Islam","doi":"10.1109/ICREST57604.2023.10070026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the fact that, much research has been conducted to improve accuracy in software bug prediction through different Machine Learning (ML) classifiers, not concentrated on the performance evaluation on the applicability of ML algorithms to detect software bugs. This inadequacy is focused on this paper. In this research, we conducted software bug prediction comparison on six different ML algorithms. Moreover, we adopted Code Based Metrics (CBM) to predict software defect through sequential neural network (DL) model and compared it with generic models. The performance of different models has been evaluated and compared based on PROMISE dataset provided by NASA. Results have shown that ML Techniques and DL Approaches have similar bug prediction capabilities where Decision Tree technique performing the worst and Support Vector Machine gave the best results. Also, thoughtful feature selection provides noticeable difference compared to no feature selection during model construction.","PeriodicalId":389360,"journal":{"name":"2023 3rd International Conference on Robotics, Electrical and Signal Processing Techniques (ICREST)","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 3rd International Conference on Robotics, Electrical and Signal Processing Techniques (ICREST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICREST57604.2023.10070026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the fact that, much research has been conducted to improve accuracy in software bug prediction through different Machine Learning (ML) classifiers, not concentrated on the performance evaluation on the applicability of ML algorithms to detect software bugs. This inadequacy is focused on this paper. In this research, we conducted software bug prediction comparison on six different ML algorithms. Moreover, we adopted Code Based Metrics (CBM) to predict software defect through sequential neural network (DL) model and compared it with generic models. The performance of different models has been evaluated and compared based on PROMISE dataset provided by NASA. Results have shown that ML Techniques and DL Approaches have similar bug prediction capabilities where Decision Tree technique performing the worst and Support Vector Machine gave the best results. Also, thoughtful feature selection provides noticeable difference compared to no feature selection during model construction.
智能软件Bug预测:一种经验方法
尽管已经有很多研究通过不同的机器学习(ML)分类器来提高软件bug预测的准确性,但并没有集中在ML算法检测软件bug适用性的性能评估上。这是本文关注的不足之处。在这项研究中,我们对六种不同的机器学习算法进行了软件bug预测比较。在此基础上,采用基于代码度量(Code Based Metrics, CBM)的顺序神经网络(sequential neural network, DL)模型对软件缺陷进行预测,并与一般模型进行比较。基于NASA提供的PROMISE数据集,对不同模型的性能进行了评估和比较。结果表明,ML技术和DL方法具有相似的错误预测能力,其中决策树技术表现最差,支持向量机给出了最好的结果。此外,在模型构建过程中,深思熟虑的特征选择与没有特征选择相比提供了显著的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信