How Customer Satisfaction Drivers in Online Reviews of Food Trucks and Quick Service Restaurants Differ: Proposing the Concept of Anticipation

Richard Gruss, Jessie Quesenberry, Eojina Kim, Alan S. Abrahams, P. Ractham
{"title":"How Customer Satisfaction Drivers in Online Reviews of Food Trucks and Quick Service Restaurants Differ: Proposing the Concept of Anticipation","authors":"Richard Gruss, Jessie Quesenberry, Eojina Kim, Alan S. Abrahams, P. Ractham","doi":"10.1177/10963480221143042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although food trucks have attracted significant attention among the dining public, little is known in the academic literature about what drives consumer satisfaction with them. Employing a grounded theory methodology, we analyzed a large set of Yelp reviews to determine whether the antecedents of satisfaction with food trucks differ from those associated with quick-service restaurants. We found that for most attributes, positive experiences at food trucks have smaller upward effects on satisfaction than they do for quick service restaurants, whereas negative experiences have larger downward effects. We further found that comments about anticipation appear far more frequently in food truck reviews, suggesting that the downward effect of negative experiences may be attributable to expectations. This has implications for theory in that it suggests some modifications to conventional instruments for measuring satisfaction. It also has implications for management practice, in that it suggests best practices with regard to managing expectations of food trucks.","PeriodicalId":369021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480221143042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although food trucks have attracted significant attention among the dining public, little is known in the academic literature about what drives consumer satisfaction with them. Employing a grounded theory methodology, we analyzed a large set of Yelp reviews to determine whether the antecedents of satisfaction with food trucks differ from those associated with quick-service restaurants. We found that for most attributes, positive experiences at food trucks have smaller upward effects on satisfaction than they do for quick service restaurants, whereas negative experiences have larger downward effects. We further found that comments about anticipation appear far more frequently in food truck reviews, suggesting that the downward effect of negative experiences may be attributable to expectations. This has implications for theory in that it suggests some modifications to conventional instruments for measuring satisfaction. It also has implications for management practice, in that it suggests best practices with regard to managing expectations of food trucks.
快餐车和快餐店在线评论中的顾客满意度驱动因素有何不同:提出期待的概念
尽管快餐车在就餐人群中引起了极大的关注,但在学术文献中,人们对消费者对快餐车满意的原因知之甚少。采用扎根理论的方法,我们分析了大量的Yelp评论,以确定对快餐车的满意度与快餐店的满意度是否不同。我们发现,对于大多数属性,在快餐车的积极体验对满意度的上升影响小于快餐店,而消极体验对满意度的下降影响较大。我们进一步发现,关于预期的评论在餐车评论中出现的频率要高得多,这表明负面体验的下行效应可能归因于预期。这对理论有影响,因为它建议对测量满意度的传统工具进行一些修改。它对管理实践也有影响,因为它提出了关于管理食品卡车期望的最佳实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信