{"title":"Pessoa, direitos fundamentais e direito da personalidade","authors":"J. O. Ascensão","doi":"10.36751/rdh.v6i1.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The apparent unanimity in the affirmation of the dignity of the person human being as bedding of the societies contemporaneous hides the biggest divergences. The basic rights before translate a vision without ethical base, that flatters the man-mass for the illusion of that everything is given to it and nothing it is asked for to it. The personality rights suffer similar distortion, threatening to change them into the egoistic kingdom of privacy and to forget the dimension solidarity. But without substantive base if it very does not justify the privileged regimen of that they have. It has that to reencounter the person, retaking the line that if covered from the philosophy Greek and of the Christianity. The man is an autonomous with proper ends, responsible being for its selfrealization. This does not become in the associability, against the others, but in solidarity, with the others. It is considered that if it transits of the personality rights, then in the origin marked by individualistic distortion, for a Right which involves the Personality, with rights and duties centered in the ontological and ethical essence of the person human being and in the communitarian integration of constituent it. The apparent unanimity in the affirmation of the dignity of the person human being as bedding of the societies contemporaries hides the biggest divergences. The basic rights before translate a vision without ethical base, that flatters the man-mass for the illusion of that everything is given to it and nothing it is asked for to it. The personality rights suffer similar distortion, threatening to change themselves into the egoistic kingdom of privacy and to forget the dimension solidarity. But without substantive base it does not justify the privileged regimen of that they have. It has that to research the person, retaking the line that if covered from the philosophy Greek and of the Christianity","PeriodicalId":429341,"journal":{"name":"Revista Direitos Humanos Fundamentais","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Direitos Humanos Fundamentais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36751/rdh.v6i1.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The apparent unanimity in the affirmation of the dignity of the person human being as bedding of the societies contemporaneous hides the biggest divergences. The basic rights before translate a vision without ethical base, that flatters the man-mass for the illusion of that everything is given to it and nothing it is asked for to it. The personality rights suffer similar distortion, threatening to change them into the egoistic kingdom of privacy and to forget the dimension solidarity. But without substantive base if it very does not justify the privileged regimen of that they have. It has that to reencounter the person, retaking the line that if covered from the philosophy Greek and of the Christianity. The man is an autonomous with proper ends, responsible being for its selfrealization. This does not become in the associability, against the others, but in solidarity, with the others. It is considered that if it transits of the personality rights, then in the origin marked by individualistic distortion, for a Right which involves the Personality, with rights and duties centered in the ontological and ethical essence of the person human being and in the communitarian integration of constituent it. The apparent unanimity in the affirmation of the dignity of the person human being as bedding of the societies contemporaries hides the biggest divergences. The basic rights before translate a vision without ethical base, that flatters the man-mass for the illusion of that everything is given to it and nothing it is asked for to it. The personality rights suffer similar distortion, threatening to change themselves into the egoistic kingdom of privacy and to forget the dimension solidarity. But without substantive base it does not justify the privileged regimen of that they have. It has that to research the person, retaking the line that if covered from the philosophy Greek and of the Christianity