Comparison of magnetostimulation limits for axial and transverse drive fields in MPI

Elaine Y Yu, E. Saritas, S. Conolly
{"title":"Comparison of magnetostimulation limits for axial and transverse drive fields in MPI","authors":"Elaine Y Yu, E. Saritas, S. Conolly","doi":"10.1109/IWMPI.2013.6528324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As shown in Fig. 1b, the mean magneto stimulation thresholds for the transverse field was approximately 3 times lower than the axial field (ΔBmin = 26 mT-pp vs. 78 mT-pp) for the same set of subjects, with comparable τc values (265 μs vs. 243 μs). In addition, the percentage deviation across subjects was significantly smaller for the transverse field (13%) than the axial field (28%). For both transverse and axial fields, the data trends were well modeled by the hyperbolic amplitude vs. frequency curve, as demonstrated in Fig. 1c for a single subject.","PeriodicalId":267566,"journal":{"name":"2013 International Workshop on Magnetic Particle Imaging (IWMPI)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 International Workshop on Magnetic Particle Imaging (IWMPI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWMPI.2013.6528324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

As shown in Fig. 1b, the mean magneto stimulation thresholds for the transverse field was approximately 3 times lower than the axial field (ΔBmin = 26 mT-pp vs. 78 mT-pp) for the same set of subjects, with comparable τc values (265 μs vs. 243 μs). In addition, the percentage deviation across subjects was significantly smaller for the transverse field (13%) than the axial field (28%). For both transverse and axial fields, the data trends were well modeled by the hyperbolic amplitude vs. frequency curve, as demonstrated in Fig. 1c for a single subject.
MPI轴向和横向驱动磁场的磁刺激极限比较
如图1b所示,对于同一组受试者,横向磁场的平均磁刺激阈值比轴向磁场低约3倍(ΔBmin = 26 mT-pp vs. 78 mT-pp), τc值相当(265 μs vs. 243 μs)。此外,横向视场的受试者间偏差百分比(13%)明显小于轴向视场(28%)。对于横向场和轴向场,数据趋势很好地由双曲振幅与频率曲线模拟,如图1c所示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信