{"title":"Verification and Data Processing of Open Data for Data-Driven News Stories in Lokadata.id and Katadata.co.id","authors":"Amalia Nurul Muthmainnah, Maulana Arief, Nurul Fitriyani","doi":"10.24198/jkj.v6i1.37167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the existence of open data, journalists have additional investigative tools to report on issues in the public interest and to hold the government to account. However, it remains outside the mainstream of journalism due to the limitation to access and work with data. The open data initiative in Indonesia has started since 2010. Adhering to UU No. 14 Tahun 2008 about Public Information Openness, Indonesia has implemented an open data portal, called Satu Data Indonesia in 2019. There are indeed a handful of studies that examine the implementation of open data portals in Indonesia. However, only a few studies have given attention to how data journalists are using these data and their perceptions about the quality of data provided by the government. This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach and collects data through semi-structured in-depth interviews. It is intended to see the process on how data journalists in Indonesia turn data to news stories. By studying Lokadata.id and Katadata.co.id, we found that data provided by the authority sources (government) are still the main sources for data journalists in Indonesia. Despite the fact that the quality of data is getting better, most journalists in this study argued that the government’s open data has not yet integrated and has no basic standard that is collectively used. Therefore, the verification process and data processing in each media is important. The most common ways that journalists use to verify the data are by exploring the raw data, contacting the institution that provided the data, and considering the reputation of the data sources. However, there is a tendency of data journalists to be passively relying on official sources and ‘hide behind’ the perceived credibility of their sources.","PeriodicalId":365742,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Kajian Jurnalisme","volume":"162 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Kajian Jurnalisme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24198/jkj.v6i1.37167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With the existence of open data, journalists have additional investigative tools to report on issues in the public interest and to hold the government to account. However, it remains outside the mainstream of journalism due to the limitation to access and work with data. The open data initiative in Indonesia has started since 2010. Adhering to UU No. 14 Tahun 2008 about Public Information Openness, Indonesia has implemented an open data portal, called Satu Data Indonesia in 2019. There are indeed a handful of studies that examine the implementation of open data portals in Indonesia. However, only a few studies have given attention to how data journalists are using these data and their perceptions about the quality of data provided by the government. This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach and collects data through semi-structured in-depth interviews. It is intended to see the process on how data journalists in Indonesia turn data to news stories. By studying Lokadata.id and Katadata.co.id, we found that data provided by the authority sources (government) are still the main sources for data journalists in Indonesia. Despite the fact that the quality of data is getting better, most journalists in this study argued that the government’s open data has not yet integrated and has no basic standard that is collectively used. Therefore, the verification process and data processing in each media is important. The most common ways that journalists use to verify the data are by exploring the raw data, contacting the institution that provided the data, and considering the reputation of the data sources. However, there is a tendency of data journalists to be passively relying on official sources and ‘hide behind’ the perceived credibility of their sources.
由于开放数据的存在,记者有了更多的调查工具来报道与公众利益有关的问题,并要求政府承担责任。然而,由于访问和处理数据的限制,它仍然处于新闻业的主流之外。印尼的开放数据倡议始于2010年。根据2008年关于公共信息开放的第14号Tahun决议,印度尼西亚于2019年实施了一个名为Satu data Indonesia的开放数据门户。确实有一些研究考察了印尼开放数据门户的实施情况。然而,只有少数研究关注数据记者如何使用这些数据以及他们对政府提供的数据质量的看法。本研究采用描述性定性方法,并通过半结构化深度访谈收集数据。它旨在了解印度尼西亚的数据记者如何将数据转化为新闻报道的过程。通过研究Lokadata。id和Katadata.co。在印度尼西亚,我们发现权威来源(政府)提供的数据仍然是数据记者的主要来源。尽管数据质量越来越好,但本研究中大多数记者认为政府的开放数据尚未整合,没有集体使用的基本标准。因此,每种介质的验证过程和数据处理都很重要。记者核实数据最常用的方法是探索原始数据,联系提供数据的机构,并考虑数据源的声誉。然而,数据记者有一种倾向,即被动地依赖官方消息来源,并“躲在”他们认为的消息来源的可信度后面。