12.C Institutions and Economic Relations in the Roman Empire: Consumption, Supply, and Coordination

Eli J. S. Weaverdyck
{"title":"12.C Institutions and Economic Relations in the Roman Empire: Consumption, Supply, and Coordination","authors":"Eli J. S. Weaverdyck","doi":"10.1515/9783110607642-020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The global history of inter-imperial trade and transcontinental connectivity is the story of networks and relationships, their varying geographical extent and interlinkages, the institutional structures that allowed for different types of transactions to be carried out across them, and the way these changed over time. This chapter sketches the Roman part of that history. I approach the Roman economy as a set of coordinated behaviors that resulted in the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. In premodern economies, the cost of transporting goods over long distances and the difficulty of obtaining reliable information about potential partners represented significant constraints on the quantity and complexity of economic transactions that could take place, and therefore on the economy as a whole. Peter Bang characterizes the ancient economy as a peasant economy of hardsided cells that needed to be punctured in order to generate long-distance flows of goods.1 Nevertheless, a variety of archaeological proxies seem to suggest that, in the period under consideration here (300 –300 ), more goods were traveling across longer distances than before and that the Mediterranean world saw some economic growth (though there remains some debate as to how intensive versus extensive that growth was and how integrated the economy truly was).2 Rather than focusing on the abstract questions of economic growth or integration, I focus on the structures that allowed for more extensive economic coordination. By economic coordination I mean action taken in the expectation that others would take complementary action, be that production and consumption or cooperation in production and distribution. Coordination requires social relationships (weak and strong), so in line with the approaches of this volume I examine the economy as a series of interactions embedded within social networks and shaped by institutions. Although technological development and the construction of infrastructure played important roles in the Roman economy (for which, see ch. 8.A, sections VII and IV respectively), I set these aside for the present to focus on the social structures and networks that knit people together across the Roman world and allowed people, goods, and","PeriodicalId":128613,"journal":{"name":"Handbook of Ancient Afro-Eurasian Economies","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handbook of Ancient Afro-Eurasian Economies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110607642-020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global history of inter-imperial trade and transcontinental connectivity is the story of networks and relationships, their varying geographical extent and interlinkages, the institutional structures that allowed for different types of transactions to be carried out across them, and the way these changed over time. This chapter sketches the Roman part of that history. I approach the Roman economy as a set of coordinated behaviors that resulted in the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. In premodern economies, the cost of transporting goods over long distances and the difficulty of obtaining reliable information about potential partners represented significant constraints on the quantity and complexity of economic transactions that could take place, and therefore on the economy as a whole. Peter Bang characterizes the ancient economy as a peasant economy of hardsided cells that needed to be punctured in order to generate long-distance flows of goods.1 Nevertheless, a variety of archaeological proxies seem to suggest that, in the period under consideration here (300 –300 ), more goods were traveling across longer distances than before and that the Mediterranean world saw some economic growth (though there remains some debate as to how intensive versus extensive that growth was and how integrated the economy truly was).2 Rather than focusing on the abstract questions of economic growth or integration, I focus on the structures that allowed for more extensive economic coordination. By economic coordination I mean action taken in the expectation that others would take complementary action, be that production and consumption or cooperation in production and distribution. Coordination requires social relationships (weak and strong), so in line with the approaches of this volume I examine the economy as a series of interactions embedded within social networks and shaped by institutions. Although technological development and the construction of infrastructure played important roles in the Roman economy (for which, see ch. 8.A, sections VII and IV respectively), I set these aside for the present to focus on the social structures and networks that knit people together across the Roman world and allowed people, goods, and
罗马帝国的制度和经济关系:消费、供给和协调
帝国间贸易和跨大陆连通性的全球历史是一个网络和关系的故事,它们不同的地理范围和相互联系,允许不同类型的交易在它们之间进行的制度结构,以及它们随着时间的推移而变化的方式。本章概述了那段历史中的罗马部分。我认为罗马经济是一系列协调一致的行为,这些行为导致了商品和服务的生产、分配和消费。在前现代经济中,长距离运输货物的成本和难以获得有关潜在伙伴的可靠信息,严重限制了可能发生的经济交易的数量和复杂性,因而也限制了整个经济。彼得·邦将古代经济描述为农民经济的硬细胞,为了产生长距离的货物流动,这些硬细胞需要被戳破尽管如此,各种考古代理似乎表明,在这里考虑的时期(300-300),更多的货物比以前运输的距离更远,地中海世界看到了一些经济增长(尽管关于这种增长是密集还是广泛以及经济真正一体化的程度仍然存在一些争论)我没有把重点放在经济增长或一体化的抽象问题上,而是放在允许更广泛的经济协调的结构上。所谓经济协调,我指的是在期望他人采取补充行动的情况下采取的行动,无论是生产和消费,还是生产和分配方面的合作。协调需要社会关系(或强或弱),因此,根据本卷的方法,我将经济视为嵌入社会网络并由制度形成的一系列互动。尽管技术发展和基础设施建设在罗马经济中发挥了重要作用(详见第8章)。A,分别是第七节和第四节),我暂时把这些放在一边关注社会结构和网络这些社会结构和网络将罗马世界的人们联系在一起并允许人们,货物,和
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信