Benchmarking shape completion methods for robotic grasping

J. Balão, Atabak Dehban, Plinio Moreno, J. Santos-Victor
{"title":"Benchmarking shape completion methods for robotic grasping","authors":"J. Balão, Atabak Dehban, Plinio Moreno, J. Santos-Victor","doi":"10.1109/ICDL53763.2022.9962226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes a novel benchmark for 3D shape completion methods based on their adaptability for the task of robotic grasping.Firstly, state-of-the-art single image shape completion methods are used to reconstruct object shapes from RGB images. These images contain views of objects belonging to different categories. Two specific shape-reconstruction methods are selected for this study.On the next step, the resulting 3D reconstructions of these methods are loaded into a robotic grasp simulator in order to attempt to grasp the objects from different approaches and using different hand configurations. Then, the unsuccessful grasps (according to a grasp quality metric) are excluded and the remaining ones are used to compute a grasp related metric, the Joint Error, which evaluates the usability of the reconstructed mesh for grasping the ground-truth 3D model.Finally, based on the results obtained from our experiments, we draw several conclusions about the performance of each of the methods. Furthermore, an analysis is made for the possible correlation between the newly proposed Joint Error metric and the popular reconstruction quality metrics used by most shape completion methods. Our results indicate that geometry-based reconstruction metrics are mostly inadequate for assessing the usability of a 3D reconstruction algorithm for robotic grasping.","PeriodicalId":274171,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL)","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDL53763.2022.9962226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel benchmark for 3D shape completion methods based on their adaptability for the task of robotic grasping.Firstly, state-of-the-art single image shape completion methods are used to reconstruct object shapes from RGB images. These images contain views of objects belonging to different categories. Two specific shape-reconstruction methods are selected for this study.On the next step, the resulting 3D reconstructions of these methods are loaded into a robotic grasp simulator in order to attempt to grasp the objects from different approaches and using different hand configurations. Then, the unsuccessful grasps (according to a grasp quality metric) are excluded and the remaining ones are used to compute a grasp related metric, the Joint Error, which evaluates the usability of the reconstructed mesh for grasping the ground-truth 3D model.Finally, based on the results obtained from our experiments, we draw several conclusions about the performance of each of the methods. Furthermore, an analysis is made for the possible correlation between the newly proposed Joint Error metric and the popular reconstruction quality metrics used by most shape completion methods. Our results indicate that geometry-based reconstruction metrics are mostly inadequate for assessing the usability of a 3D reconstruction algorithm for robotic grasping.
机器人抓取的基准形状补全方法
基于三维形状补全方法对机器人抓取任务的适应性,提出了一种新的三维形状补全方法基准。首先,采用最先进的单幅图像形状补全方法从RGB图像中重建物体形状。这些图像包含了属于不同类别的物体的视图。本研究选择了两种具体的形状重建方法。下一步,将这些方法的三维重建结果加载到机器人抓取模拟器中,以便尝试从不同的方法和使用不同的手配置来抓取物体。然后,排除不成功的抓取(根据抓取质量度量),并使用剩余的抓取来计算抓取相关度量,即联合误差,该误差评估重建网格对于抓取真实三维模型的可用性。最后,根据我们的实验结果,我们得出了关于每种方法性能的几个结论。此外,还分析了新提出的关节误差度量与大多数形状补全方法中常用的重建质量度量之间可能存在的相关性。我们的研究结果表明,基于几何的重建指标大多不足以评估机器人抓取三维重建算法的可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信