Positive and negative work reflection, engagement and exhaustion in dual-earner couples: Exploring living with children and work-linkage as moderators

J. Walter, Verena C. Haun
{"title":"Positive and negative work reflection, engagement and exhaustion in dual-earner couples: Exploring living with children and work-linkage as moderators","authors":"J. Walter, Verena C. Haun","doi":"10.1177/2397002220964930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many employees think about their work during off-job time. Scholars have suggested that whether work-related thoughts during off-job time have detrimental or beneficial effects on employees’ well-being and performance depends on the nature of these thoughts. In this study with dual-earner couples we examined whether employees’ positive and negative work reflection during off-job time are associated with their own and with their partners’ work engagement and exhaustion. Furthermore, we investigated whether (a) living with children and (b) being work-linked (i.e. working in the same organisation and/or working in the same profession) moderated these relations. Both partners of 130 German heterosexual dual-earner couples responded to online questionnaires. We estimated multilevel analyses using the actor–partner interdependence model to analyse our dyadic data. We found positive associations between employees’ positive work reflection and both their own and their partners’ work engagement. Employees’ positive work reflection was also associated with their decreased exhaustion. Employees’ negative work reflection was negatively associated with their own work engagement and positively associated with their own exhaustion but unrelated to their partners’ outcomes. Moderator analyses revealed that living with children weakened the link between employees’ positive work reflection and their own work engagement and strengthened the link between their negative work reflection and exhaustion. The presence of couples’ work-linkage did not moderate any of these relations. This study builds on previous research by showing that employees’ positive work-related thinking is not only beneficial to themselves but also to their partners. Furthermore, the results suggest that living with children constitutes an additional demand that reduces the motivational effects of positive work reflection and amplifies the detrimental effects of employees’ negative work reflection.","PeriodicalId":206271,"journal":{"name":"German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung","volume":"302 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2397002220964930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Many employees think about their work during off-job time. Scholars have suggested that whether work-related thoughts during off-job time have detrimental or beneficial effects on employees’ well-being and performance depends on the nature of these thoughts. In this study with dual-earner couples we examined whether employees’ positive and negative work reflection during off-job time are associated with their own and with their partners’ work engagement and exhaustion. Furthermore, we investigated whether (a) living with children and (b) being work-linked (i.e. working in the same organisation and/or working in the same profession) moderated these relations. Both partners of 130 German heterosexual dual-earner couples responded to online questionnaires. We estimated multilevel analyses using the actor–partner interdependence model to analyse our dyadic data. We found positive associations between employees’ positive work reflection and both their own and their partners’ work engagement. Employees’ positive work reflection was also associated with their decreased exhaustion. Employees’ negative work reflection was negatively associated with their own work engagement and positively associated with their own exhaustion but unrelated to their partners’ outcomes. Moderator analyses revealed that living with children weakened the link between employees’ positive work reflection and their own work engagement and strengthened the link between their negative work reflection and exhaustion. The presence of couples’ work-linkage did not moderate any of these relations. This study builds on previous research by showing that employees’ positive work-related thinking is not only beneficial to themselves but also to their partners. Furthermore, the results suggest that living with children constitutes an additional demand that reduces the motivational effects of positive work reflection and amplifies the detrimental effects of employees’ negative work reflection.
双职工家庭的积极和消极的工作反思、投入和疲惫:探索与孩子一起生活和工作联系作为调节因素
很多员工会在下班时间思考自己的工作。学者们认为,非工作时间与工作相关的想法对员工的幸福感和绩效是有益还是有害,取决于这些想法的性质。在本研究中,我们以双职工夫妇为研究对象,考察了员工在下班时间的积极和消极的工作反思是否与他们自己和他们的伴侣的工作投入和疲惫有关。此外,我们调查了(a)与孩子一起生活和(b)工作联系(即在同一组织工作和/或在同一职业工作)是否调节了这些关系。130对德国异性恋双职工夫妇的夫妻双方都回答了在线调查问卷。我们使用参与者-合作伙伴相互依赖模型来估计多重分析,以分析我们的二元数据。我们发现员工的积极工作反思与他们自己和他们的合作伙伴的工作投入之间存在正相关。员工对工作的积极反思也与他们减少疲劳有关。员工的消极工作反思与自己的工作投入负相关,与自己的疲惫正相关,但与伴侣的结果无关。调节分析显示,与子女生活在一起削弱了员工积极工作反思与自身工作投入之间的联系,增强了员工消极工作反思与疲惫之间的联系。夫妻之间的工作联系并没有缓和这些关系。这项研究建立在先前的研究基础上,表明员工积极的工作思维不仅对自己有益,也对他们的伴侣有益。此外,研究结果表明,与孩子一起生活构成了一种额外的需求,降低了员工积极工作反思的激励作用,放大了员工消极工作反思的有害影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信