Investigative reporting: Reconsidering the public view

Susan K. Opt, Tim Delaney
{"title":"Investigative reporting: Reconsidering the public view","authors":"Susan K. Opt, Tim Delaney","doi":"10.1080/15456870109367399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"U.S. media researchers and pollsters have examined public approval of investigative reporting and its techniques. They have attempted to identify variables that influence those perceptions and looked at recall of specific investigative series. What has not received much attention, however, is whether the public being surveyed is responding to the concept of investigative reporting as defined by researchers and media professionals and whether the public believes it takes action as a result of these reports. This becomes the focus of this preliminary study. This study finds that the U.S. public seems to name any story involving an investigation as investigative reporting, and investigative reports appear to have minimal influence. This raises questions about what investigative journalism researchers have been measuring and why the public continues to show support when it is unable to recall investigative stories.","PeriodicalId":113832,"journal":{"name":"New Jersey Journal of Communication","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Jersey Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870109367399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

U.S. media researchers and pollsters have examined public approval of investigative reporting and its techniques. They have attempted to identify variables that influence those perceptions and looked at recall of specific investigative series. What has not received much attention, however, is whether the public being surveyed is responding to the concept of investigative reporting as defined by researchers and media professionals and whether the public believes it takes action as a result of these reports. This becomes the focus of this preliminary study. This study finds that the U.S. public seems to name any story involving an investigation as investigative reporting, and investigative reports appear to have minimal influence. This raises questions about what investigative journalism researchers have been measuring and why the public continues to show support when it is unable to recall investigative stories.
调查报道:重新考虑公众观点
美国媒体研究人员和民意测验专家调查了公众对调查性报道及其技术的认可程度。他们试图找出影响这些认知的变量,并研究对特定调查系列的回忆。然而,没有受到太多关注的是,被调查的公众是否对研究人员和媒体专业人士所定义的调查性报道的概念作出反应,以及公众是否相信他们会因为这些报道而采取行动。这成为本文初步研究的重点。这项研究发现,美国公众似乎把任何涉及调查的报道都称为调查性报道,而调查性报道的影响力似乎微乎其微。这引发了一些问题:调查新闻研究人员一直在衡量什么?为什么公众在无法回忆起调查报道的情况下仍继续表示支持?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信