Design Thinking Concept in higher education sector: A comparison of a representative the Polish and the American university

Z. Malara, Yasmin Ziaeian
{"title":"Design Thinking Concept in higher education sector: A comparison of a representative the Polish and the American university","authors":"Z. Malara, Yasmin Ziaeian","doi":"10.56652/ejmss2021.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Design thinking is an instrument for promoting innovation in business and also a new and important approach in education. Design thinking is a creative process, which enables the student to improve innovative personalities and will also help to create contemporary educational tools. Based on the query of the literature review, the authors of the article noticed the presence of this issue in the works of theoreticians, and at the same time they stated noticeably lack of indications for the implementation of these findings and possibilities and their verification in practice (educating specialists and students). As traditional education and learning tools are not sufficient, therefore the importance of design thinking is increasing in high education sectors, despite the implementation of this topic at universities and business schools being very slow. This study compares the courses at Hasso Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford University (d.school), as the leader in the field of design thinking, and Wroclaw University of Science and Technology. Using a case study approach, could assist the researchers in understanding the gaps and provide suggestions for improving the courses in a Polish university in comparison with the leader of design thinking.","PeriodicalId":112466,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Management and Social Science","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Management and Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56652/ejmss2021.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Design thinking is an instrument for promoting innovation in business and also a new and important approach in education. Design thinking is a creative process, which enables the student to improve innovative personalities and will also help to create contemporary educational tools. Based on the query of the literature review, the authors of the article noticed the presence of this issue in the works of theoreticians, and at the same time they stated noticeably lack of indications for the implementation of these findings and possibilities and their verification in practice (educating specialists and students). As traditional education and learning tools are not sufficient, therefore the importance of design thinking is increasing in high education sectors, despite the implementation of this topic at universities and business schools being very slow. This study compares the courses at Hasso Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford University (d.school), as the leader in the field of design thinking, and Wroclaw University of Science and Technology. Using a case study approach, could assist the researchers in understanding the gaps and provide suggestions for improving the courses in a Polish university in comparison with the leader of design thinking.
高等教育领域的设计思维理念:波兰与美国代表性大学之比较
设计思维是促进商业创新的工具,也是教育的重要新途径。设计思维是一个创造性的过程,它使学生能够提高创新的个性,也将有助于创造当代教育工具。根据文献综述的查询,文章的作者注意到理论家的作品中存在这个问题,同时他们明显地指出,缺乏对这些发现和可能性的实施及其在实践中的验证的指示(教育专家和学生)。由于传统的教育和学习工具是不够的,因此设计思维在高等教育领域的重要性正在增加,尽管这一主题在大学和商学院的实施非常缓慢。本研究比较了在设计思维领域处于领先地位的斯坦福大学Hasso Plattner设计学院(d.school)和弗罗茨瓦夫科技大学的课程。使用案例研究的方法,可以帮助研究人员了解差距,并提供建议,以改进波兰大学的课程与设计思维的领导者进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信