Improved mooring line technology for tankers and gas carriers at exposed berths

S. Banfield, J. Flory
{"title":"Improved mooring line technology for tankers and gas carriers at exposed berths","authors":"S. Banfield, J. Flory","doi":"10.23919/OCEANS.2009.5422401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fixed-pier berths for tankers and gas carriers are now sometimes installed and operated in locations exposed to waves and swell. In these conditions, the moored vessel can experience large motions which overload and fatigue mooring lines. Tails are short lengths of synthetic fiber rope which are placed in series with the vessel's winch-mounted wires to decrease mooring line stiffness and thus to reduce peak line loads and fatigue due to vessel motions. Past guidelines for conventional tankers and berths recommended the use of 1 lm long nylon tails on mooring lines. Those guidelines were developed many years ago when tankers were relatively small and when fixed-pier berths were located in protected harbors. But when such short nylon tails are used on large vessels at exposed berths, the mooring loads are high and the nylon tails tend to fatigue quickly and fail. Tension Technology International (TTI) recently conduced a study to investigate these problems and make recommendations for mooring lines and tails for use on modern large tankers and gas carriers, especially at exposed locations. The study assessed how waves influence vessel motions and line tensions and how tail length and material influence mooring line loads and fatigue. New recommendations were prepared for tail length and material for use at berths where vessel motions are significant. Large vessels can accommodate longer tail, and longer tail length decreases mooring line stiffness thus and reduces peak mooring line loads. Polyester rope is suffer than nylon, but longer polyester tails can achieve loads similar to short nylon tails. In some situations, polyester tails should be preferred, as that material has much better fatigue performance than nylon, especially in wet condition. Many vessels now use HMPE fiber rope mooring lines instead of wires. These HMPE mooring lines are essentially the same size and as strong as the wires they replace. They are much lighter and easier to handle and thus help crew safety. They are not as stiff as wire rope and thus reduce peak mooring line loads. The recommendations of this study are now published in mooring guidelines and used by tanker and gas-carrier operators.","PeriodicalId":119977,"journal":{"name":"OCEANS 2009","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OCEANS 2009","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/OCEANS.2009.5422401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Fixed-pier berths for tankers and gas carriers are now sometimes installed and operated in locations exposed to waves and swell. In these conditions, the moored vessel can experience large motions which overload and fatigue mooring lines. Tails are short lengths of synthetic fiber rope which are placed in series with the vessel's winch-mounted wires to decrease mooring line stiffness and thus to reduce peak line loads and fatigue due to vessel motions. Past guidelines for conventional tankers and berths recommended the use of 1 lm long nylon tails on mooring lines. Those guidelines were developed many years ago when tankers were relatively small and when fixed-pier berths were located in protected harbors. But when such short nylon tails are used on large vessels at exposed berths, the mooring loads are high and the nylon tails tend to fatigue quickly and fail. Tension Technology International (TTI) recently conduced a study to investigate these problems and make recommendations for mooring lines and tails for use on modern large tankers and gas carriers, especially at exposed locations. The study assessed how waves influence vessel motions and line tensions and how tail length and material influence mooring line loads and fatigue. New recommendations were prepared for tail length and material for use at berths where vessel motions are significant. Large vessels can accommodate longer tail, and longer tail length decreases mooring line stiffness thus and reduces peak mooring line loads. Polyester rope is suffer than nylon, but longer polyester tails can achieve loads similar to short nylon tails. In some situations, polyester tails should be preferred, as that material has much better fatigue performance than nylon, especially in wet condition. Many vessels now use HMPE fiber rope mooring lines instead of wires. These HMPE mooring lines are essentially the same size and as strong as the wires they replace. They are much lighter and easier to handle and thus help crew safety. They are not as stiff as wire rope and thus reduce peak mooring line loads. The recommendations of this study are now published in mooring guidelines and used by tanker and gas-carrier operators.
改进油轮和天然气运输船在外露泊位的系泊线技术
油轮和天然气运输船的固定码头泊位现在有时安装和操作在暴露于波浪和膨胀的地方。在这些条件下,系泊船舶会经历巨大的运动,使系泊线过载和疲劳。尾缆是短长度的合成纤维绳,与船舶的绞车缆绳串联在一起,以降低系泊缆绳的刚度,从而减少船舶运动引起的峰值缆绳负荷和疲劳。过去的常规油轮和泊位指南建议在系缆上使用1英尺长的尼龙尾。这些准则是多年前制定的,当时油轮相对较小,固定码头泊位位于受保护的港口。但在大型船舶外露泊位上使用这种短尼龙尾时,系泊载荷大,尼龙尾容易疲劳而失效。张力技术国际公司(TTI)最近进行了一项研究,调查了这些问题,并为现代大型油轮和天然气运输船的系缆和尾缆提出了建议,特别是在暴露的位置。该研究评估了波浪如何影响船舶运动和缆绳张力,以及尾长和材料如何影响系缆载荷和疲劳。在船舶运动较大的泊位,对尾翼长度和材料提出了新的建议。大型船舶可以容纳较长的尾,而较长的尾长度会降低系泊线的刚度,从而降低系泊线的峰值载荷。涤纶绳比尼龙绳要痛苦,但较长的聚酯尾巴可以达到与短尼龙尾巴相似的负荷。在某些情况下,聚酯尾巴应该是首选,因为这种材料比尼龙有更好的疲劳性能,特别是在潮湿的条件下。许多船只现在使用聚乙烯纤维绳系泊线而不是电线。这些HMPE系泊线基本上与它们所取代的电线大小相同,强度也一样。它们更轻,更容易操作,因此有助于机组人员的安全。它们不像钢丝绳那样坚硬,因此减少了系泊线的峰值载荷。这项研究的建议现在发表在系泊指南中,并被油轮和天然气运输船运营商使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信