Relationship Between Clinical Competency and Kolb’s Learning Style for Clinical Practice Education in Nursing Students

Mi-young Moon
{"title":"Relationship Between Clinical Competency and Kolb’s Learning Style for Clinical Practice Education in Nursing Students","authors":"Mi-young Moon","doi":"10.21742/ijaner.2019.4.2.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to understand Kolb’s learning style after clinical training of nursing students and to know the relevance of clinical competency according to learning type. The subjects of this study were 143 nursing students in 3rd and 4th year attending one of 2 universities that completed clinical training of more than 6 weeks. Data were analyzed using SPSS 21.0 program. As a result of analyzing the difference of clinical competency according to general characteristics, it was found to be significant in school satisfaction), clinical training period, and clinical training satisfaction. In the learning style degree of the subjects, the assimilator was the most frequent with 31.5% and the accommodator with 25.2%. There was a significant difference in the nursing process among the 5 sub-variables in the analysis of the difference of the clinical competency according to the learning style of the subject. There was no correlation between the learning style and clinical competency. Therefore, by focusing on the learning styles of nursing students, it is necessary to grasp the learning style according to the period rather than once, and to make educational efforts for the qualitative change according to the maturity and environment of the learner.","PeriodicalId":185170,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advanced Nursing Education and Research","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advanced Nursing Education and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21742/ijaner.2019.4.2.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to understand Kolb’s learning style after clinical training of nursing students and to know the relevance of clinical competency according to learning type. The subjects of this study were 143 nursing students in 3rd and 4th year attending one of 2 universities that completed clinical training of more than 6 weeks. Data were analyzed using SPSS 21.0 program. As a result of analyzing the difference of clinical competency according to general characteristics, it was found to be significant in school satisfaction), clinical training period, and clinical training satisfaction. In the learning style degree of the subjects, the assimilator was the most frequent with 31.5% and the accommodator with 25.2%. There was a significant difference in the nursing process among the 5 sub-variables in the analysis of the difference of the clinical competency according to the learning style of the subject. There was no correlation between the learning style and clinical competency. Therefore, by focusing on the learning styles of nursing students, it is necessary to grasp the learning style according to the period rather than once, and to make educational efforts for the qualitative change according to the maturity and environment of the learner.
护生临床实践教育中临床胜任力与Kolb学习风格的关系
本研究旨在了解护生临床训练后的Kolb学习风格,并根据学习类型了解临床胜任力的相关性。本研究的对象为143名完成临床培训6周以上的大学三、四年级护生。数据分析采用SPSS 21.0软件。通过对临床胜任力总体特征的分析,发现临床胜任力在学校满意度、临床培训时间、临床培训满意度方面存在显著差异。在被试的学习风格程度中,同化者最多(31.5%),迁就者最多(25.2%)。根据被试学习风格分析临床胜任力差异时,5个子变量在护理过程上存在显著差异。学习方式与临床胜任力无相关性。因此,关注护生的学习风格,要按时期而不是一次把握学习风格,并根据学习者的成熟程度和所处的环境进行质变的教育努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信