Experimental Determination of the Ratcheting of the Porosity for the Study of Ductile Rupture Under Cyclic Loading Conditions

A. Remmal, S. Marie, J. Leblond
{"title":"Experimental Determination of the Ratcheting of the Porosity for the Study of Ductile Rupture Under Cyclic Loading Conditions","authors":"A. Remmal, S. Marie, J. Leblond","doi":"10.1115/pvp2019-93831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n It is known that for ductile porous materials, cyclic loadings lead to lower fracture strains than monotone ones. This reduction of ductility probably arises from an effect called “ratcheting of the porosity” that consists of a continued increase of the mean porosity during each cycle with the number of cycles. Finite element based micromechanical simulations confirmed this interpretation. Recently the authors proposed a Gurson-type “layer model” better fit that Gurson’s original one which does not predict the ratcheting of the porosity, for the description of the ductile behavior under cyclic loading conditions. A very good agreement was obtained between the results of the micromechanical simulations and the model predictions for a rigid-hardenable material. Yet, the ratcheting of the porosity is a consequence of both hardening and elasticity; and the theory of sequential limit analysis used in order to get the “layer model” is strictly applicable in the absence of elasticity. Based on an expression of the porosity rate accounting for elasticity, a proposal was made to improve the new model with regard to elasticity. Simultaneously to this theoretical work, an experimental program was conducted on a model material in order to assess experimentally this new model. The material is a HIPed 316L stainless steel, with Al2O3 almost spherical inclusions acting like porosities, complying with the hypothesis made to derive the theoretical model. Notched tensile specimens, with a center section of 4mm, were cyclically loaded. Several tomographies were performed at ESRF, using a 120 keV beamline and 3x3 microns detector, in order to prove experimentally the ratcheting effect of the porosity. The void growth through the cycles is precisely described and the experimental results could then be processed and compared to the numerical porosities predictions of the model. This paper presents the experimental activity of this PhD program.","PeriodicalId":174920,"journal":{"name":"Volume 5: High-Pressure Technology; Rudy Scavuzzo Student Paper Symposium and 27th Annual Student Paper Competition; ASME Nondestructive Evaluation, Diagnosis and Prognosis Division (NDPD)","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 5: High-Pressure Technology; Rudy Scavuzzo Student Paper Symposium and 27th Annual Student Paper Competition; ASME Nondestructive Evaluation, Diagnosis and Prognosis Division (NDPD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2019-93831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is known that for ductile porous materials, cyclic loadings lead to lower fracture strains than monotone ones. This reduction of ductility probably arises from an effect called “ratcheting of the porosity” that consists of a continued increase of the mean porosity during each cycle with the number of cycles. Finite element based micromechanical simulations confirmed this interpretation. Recently the authors proposed a Gurson-type “layer model” better fit that Gurson’s original one which does not predict the ratcheting of the porosity, for the description of the ductile behavior under cyclic loading conditions. A very good agreement was obtained between the results of the micromechanical simulations and the model predictions for a rigid-hardenable material. Yet, the ratcheting of the porosity is a consequence of both hardening and elasticity; and the theory of sequential limit analysis used in order to get the “layer model” is strictly applicable in the absence of elasticity. Based on an expression of the porosity rate accounting for elasticity, a proposal was made to improve the new model with regard to elasticity. Simultaneously to this theoretical work, an experimental program was conducted on a model material in order to assess experimentally this new model. The material is a HIPed 316L stainless steel, with Al2O3 almost spherical inclusions acting like porosities, complying with the hypothesis made to derive the theoretical model. Notched tensile specimens, with a center section of 4mm, were cyclically loaded. Several tomographies were performed at ESRF, using a 120 keV beamline and 3x3 microns detector, in order to prove experimentally the ratcheting effect of the porosity. The void growth through the cycles is precisely described and the experimental results could then be processed and compared to the numerical porosities predictions of the model. This paper presents the experimental activity of this PhD program.
循环加载条件下延性断裂研究中孔隙度棘轮的实验测定
众所周知,对于延性多孔材料,循环加载比单调加载导致更低的断裂应变。这种延性的降低可能是由一种叫做“孔隙率棘轮”的效应引起的,即随着循环次数的增加,每个循环期间的平均孔隙率持续增加。基于有限元的微力学模拟证实了这一解释。最近,作者提出了一种Gurson型“层模型”来描述循环加载条件下的延性行为,该模型比Gurson模型更适合,但不能预测孔隙率的棘轮。微力学模拟结果与模型预测结果吻合较好。然而,孔隙度的棘轮是硬化和弹性共同作用的结果;为了得到“层模型”而采用的顺序极限分析理论在无弹性情况下是严格适用的。在考虑弹性因素的孔隙率表达式的基础上,提出了考虑弹性因素对新模型的改进建议。在进行理论工作的同时,对一种模型材料进行了实验程序,以便对新模型进行实验评估。材料为HIPed 316L不锈钢,Al2O3近乎球形的夹杂物类似孔隙,符合推导理论模型的假设。中心截面为4mm的缺口拉伸试件进行循环加载。为了在实验上证明孔隙度的棘轮效应,在ESRF上使用120 keV光束线和3 × 3微米探测器进行了几次层析成像。通过循环可以精确地描述孔隙的增长,然后可以对实验结果进行处理,并与模型的数值孔隙率预测进行比较。本文介绍了该博士项目的实验活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信