Mortality of treated HIV-1 positive individuals according to viral subtype in Europe and Canada: collaborative cohort analysis

M. May, M. Gill, L. Wittkop, M. Klein, Caroline Sabin, P. Harrigan, David Dunn, J. J. Vehreschild, Rafael Rubio, A. Mocroft, M. Cavassini, P. Reiss, A. Monforte, R. Zangerle, Suzanne M Ingle, T. Hill, S. Jose, J. Sterne
{"title":"Mortality of treated HIV-1 positive individuals according to viral subtype in Europe and Canada: collaborative cohort analysis","authors":"M. May, M. Gill, L. Wittkop, M. Klein, Caroline Sabin, P. Harrigan, David Dunn, J. J. Vehreschild, Rafael Rubio, A. Mocroft, M. Cavassini, P. Reiss, A. Monforte, R. Zangerle, Suzanne M Ingle, T. Hill, S. Jose, J. Sterne","doi":"10.1097/QAD.0000000000000941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives:To estimate prognosis by viral subtype in HIV-1-infected individuals from start of antiretroviral therapy (ART) and after viral failure. Design:Collaborative analysis of data from eight European and three Canadian cohorts. Methods:Adults (N>20 000) who started triple ART between 1996 and 2012 and had data on viral subtype were followed for mortality. We estimated crude and adjusted (for age, sex, regimen, CD4+ cell count, and AIDS at baseline, period of starting ART, stratified by cohort, region of origin and risk group) mortality hazard ratios (MHR) by subtype. We estimated MHR subsequent to viral failure defined as two HIV-RNA measurements greater than 500 copies/ml after achieving viral suppression. Results:The most prevalent subtypes were B (15 419; 74%), C (2091; 10%), CRF02AG (1057; 5%), A (873; 4%), CRF01AE (506; 2.4%), G (359; 1.7%), and D (232; 1.1%). Subtypes were strongly patterned by region of origin and risk group. During 104 649 person-years of observation, 1172/20 784 patients died. Compared with subtype B, mortality was higher for subtype A, but similar for all other subtypes. MHR for A versus B were 1.13 (95% confidence interval 0.85,1.50) when stratified by cohort, increased to 1.78 (1.27,2.51) on stratification by region and risk, and attenuated to 1.59 (1.14,2.23) on adjustment for covariates. MHR for A versus B was 2.65 (1.64,4.28) and 0.95 (0.57,1.57) for patients who started ART with CD4+ cell count below, or more than, 100 cells/&mgr;l, respectively. There was no difference in mortality between subtypes A, B and C after viral failure. Conclusion:Patients with subtype A had worse prognosis, an observation which may be confounded by socio-demographic factors.","PeriodicalId":355297,"journal":{"name":"AIDS (London, England)","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000000941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Objectives:To estimate prognosis by viral subtype in HIV-1-infected individuals from start of antiretroviral therapy (ART) and after viral failure. Design:Collaborative analysis of data from eight European and three Canadian cohorts. Methods:Adults (N>20 000) who started triple ART between 1996 and 2012 and had data on viral subtype were followed for mortality. We estimated crude and adjusted (for age, sex, regimen, CD4+ cell count, and AIDS at baseline, period of starting ART, stratified by cohort, region of origin and risk group) mortality hazard ratios (MHR) by subtype. We estimated MHR subsequent to viral failure defined as two HIV-RNA measurements greater than 500 copies/ml after achieving viral suppression. Results:The most prevalent subtypes were B (15 419; 74%), C (2091; 10%), CRF02AG (1057; 5%), A (873; 4%), CRF01AE (506; 2.4%), G (359; 1.7%), and D (232; 1.1%). Subtypes were strongly patterned by region of origin and risk group. During 104 649 person-years of observation, 1172/20 784 patients died. Compared with subtype B, mortality was higher for subtype A, but similar for all other subtypes. MHR for A versus B were 1.13 (95% confidence interval 0.85,1.50) when stratified by cohort, increased to 1.78 (1.27,2.51) on stratification by region and risk, and attenuated to 1.59 (1.14,2.23) on adjustment for covariates. MHR for A versus B was 2.65 (1.64,4.28) and 0.95 (0.57,1.57) for patients who started ART with CD4+ cell count below, or more than, 100 cells/&mgr;l, respectively. There was no difference in mortality between subtypes A, B and C after viral failure. Conclusion:Patients with subtype A had worse prognosis, an observation which may be confounded by socio-demographic factors.
欧洲和加拿大根据病毒亚型治疗的HIV-1阳性个体的死亡率:合作队列分析
目的:评估hiv -1感染者从抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)开始和病毒治疗失败后的病毒亚型预后。设计:对来自8个欧洲和3个加拿大队列的数据进行协作分析。方法:对1996年至2012年间接受三联抗逆转录病毒治疗并有病毒亚型数据的成人(N>2万)进行死亡率随访。我们按亚型估计粗死亡率风险比(MHR)和调整死亡率风险比(年龄、性别、治疗方案、CD4+细胞计数、基线时的艾滋病、开始抗逆转录病毒治疗的时间,按队列、原产地区和风险组分层)。我们估计了病毒失败后的MHR,定义为在实现病毒抑制后两次HIV-RNA测量大于500拷贝/ml。结果:最常见的亚型为B亚型(15 419例;74%), c (2091;10%), crf02ag (1057;5%), a (873;4%), crf01ae (506;2.4%), g (359;1.7%), D (232;1.1%)。亚型与原产地区和风险群体密切相关。在104 649人年的观察中,1172/ 20784例患者死亡。与B亚型相比,A亚型的死亡率更高,但所有其他亚型的死亡率相似。按队列分层时,A和B的MHR为1.13(95%可信区间0.85,1.50),按地区和风险分层时增加到1.78(1.27,2.51),调整协变量后减弱到1.59(1.14,2.23)。在CD4+细胞计数低于或高于100个细胞/ 1的患者开始ART治疗时,A与B的MHR分别为2.65(1.64,4.28)和0.95(0.57,1.57)。病毒失效后,A、B和C亚型之间的死亡率没有差异。结论:A亚型患者预后较差,这一观察结果可能与社会人口因素相混淆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信