Pain relief in postabortion care practiced by healthcare professionals in South Eastern Nigeria

J. Adinma, E. Adinma, N. Eke, L. Ikeako, C. Ezema, G. Eleje
{"title":"Pain relief in postabortion care practiced by healthcare professionals in South Eastern Nigeria","authors":"J. Adinma, E. Adinma, N. Eke, L. Ikeako, C. Ezema, G. Eleje","doi":"10.4103/2278-960X.161061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Postabortion care (PAC) is aimed at reducing maternal morbidity and mortality resulting from the incomplete abortion and abortion complications. The use of analgesia is an integral part of high quality PAC. Knowledge of the pattern of use of analgesia in PAC by healthcare professionals would help in planning group specific training programs for more effective PAC. Aim: This study is aimed at assessing the use of analgesia in PAC among healthcare professionals in South Eastern Nigeria. Subjects and Methods: This is a cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey carried out among healthcare professionals in Anambra State, Nigeria between June 1 and September 30, 2006. Participants were chosen using a multistage sampling technique. Pretested questionnaires assessing the practice of postabortion counseling were then administered. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 20.0 software. Frequencies were within 95% confidence limits. Results: A total of 437 health professionals were included in the study. The mean age was 38.2 (10.4) years. Formal PAC training influenced the use of analgesia positively (P < 0.001). The use of analgesia in PAC was also significantly higher among professionals working in tertiary healthcare center and private specialist hospitals when compared with other facilities (P = 0.02). In general complications were more when analgesia was not employed. Older professionals were more likely to employ pain relief in PAC (P = 0.01). Furthermore, doctors were significantly more likely to employ pain relief in PAC when compared to nurses (P = 0.001). Conclusion: This study revealed a low level of use of analgesia in PAC among the healthcare professionals. It also demonstrated a significant association between formal PAC training and use of analgesia in PAC. It is, therefore, recommended that increased PAC training and re-training activities with emphasis on the need for analgesia should be conducted for healthcare professionals to improve the quality of PAC received by clients.","PeriodicalId":356195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Reproductive Sciences","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Reproductive Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2278-960X.161061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Postabortion care (PAC) is aimed at reducing maternal morbidity and mortality resulting from the incomplete abortion and abortion complications. The use of analgesia is an integral part of high quality PAC. Knowledge of the pattern of use of analgesia in PAC by healthcare professionals would help in planning group specific training programs for more effective PAC. Aim: This study is aimed at assessing the use of analgesia in PAC among healthcare professionals in South Eastern Nigeria. Subjects and Methods: This is a cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey carried out among healthcare professionals in Anambra State, Nigeria between June 1 and September 30, 2006. Participants were chosen using a multistage sampling technique. Pretested questionnaires assessing the practice of postabortion counseling were then administered. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 20.0 software. Frequencies were within 95% confidence limits. Results: A total of 437 health professionals were included in the study. The mean age was 38.2 (10.4) years. Formal PAC training influenced the use of analgesia positively (P < 0.001). The use of analgesia in PAC was also significantly higher among professionals working in tertiary healthcare center and private specialist hospitals when compared with other facilities (P = 0.02). In general complications were more when analgesia was not employed. Older professionals were more likely to employ pain relief in PAC (P = 0.01). Furthermore, doctors were significantly more likely to employ pain relief in PAC when compared to nurses (P = 0.001). Conclusion: This study revealed a low level of use of analgesia in PAC among the healthcare professionals. It also demonstrated a significant association between formal PAC training and use of analgesia in PAC. It is, therefore, recommended that increased PAC training and re-training activities with emphasis on the need for analgesia should be conducted for healthcare professionals to improve the quality of PAC received by clients.
尼日利亚东南部医疗保健专业人员在堕胎后护理中实施的疼痛缓解
背景:流产后护理(PAC)旨在降低不完全流产和流产并发症导致的产妇发病率和死亡率。镇痛药的使用是高质量PAC的一个组成部分。医疗专业人员在PAC中使用镇痛药的模式的知识将有助于制定更有效PAC的小组特定培训计划。目的:本研究旨在评估尼日利亚东南部医疗专业人员在PAC中使用镇痛药的情况。对象和方法:这是一项基于横断面问卷的调查,于2006年6月1日至9月30日在尼日利亚阿南布拉州的医疗保健专业人员中开展。参与者采用多阶段抽样技术进行选择。然后进行预测问卷,评估堕胎后咨询的做法。采用SPSS 20.0软件对数据进行分析。频率在95%置信限内。结果:共纳入437名卫生专业人员。平均年龄为38.2(10.4)岁。正式的PAC培训对镇痛药的使用有积极影响(P < 0.001)。三级医疗保健中心和私立专科医院的专业人员在PAC中使用镇痛药的比例也明显高于其他机构(P = 0.02)。总的来说,不使用镇痛时并发症更多。年龄较大的专业人员更倾向于在PAC中使用疼痛缓解(P = 0.01)。此外,与护士相比,医生更有可能在PAC中采取疼痛缓解措施(P = 0.001)。结论:本研究揭示了医疗保健专业人员在PAC中使用镇痛药的水平较低。研究还表明,正式的PAC培训与PAC中镇痛药的使用之间存在显著关联。因此,建议医疗保健专业人员增加PAC培训和再培训活动,强调镇痛的必要性,以提高客户接受PAC的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信