Give or Get Off: The Role of Trustees in College Fundraising

Eve Proper
{"title":"Give or Get Off: The Role of Trustees in College Fundraising","authors":"Eve Proper","doi":"10.2979/phileduc.3.1.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:These three case studies of small, private liberal arts colleges examine trustee involvement in fundraising. While board giving was nearly 100%, board members were rarely involved in soliciting gifts, except from each other. None of the boards set fundraising policy, which instead came from the presidents and development offices, and most trustees displayed little depth of knowledge about the role of advancement at their institution. This does not align with the claims of either hortatory or theoretical literature, which state that trustees ought to set institutional policy, donate funds, and further advancement work via referring and soliciting prospects. These findings suggest that our expectations for trustees are unrealistic as the roles are presently framed.","PeriodicalId":343186,"journal":{"name":"Philanthropy & Education","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philanthropy & Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/phileduc.3.1.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract:These three case studies of small, private liberal arts colleges examine trustee involvement in fundraising. While board giving was nearly 100%, board members were rarely involved in soliciting gifts, except from each other. None of the boards set fundraising policy, which instead came from the presidents and development offices, and most trustees displayed little depth of knowledge about the role of advancement at their institution. This does not align with the claims of either hortatory or theoretical literature, which state that trustees ought to set institutional policy, donate funds, and further advancement work via referring and soliciting prospects. These findings suggest that our expectations for trustees are unrealistic as the roles are presently framed.
给予还是放弃:受托人在大学筹款中的作用
摘要:这三个小型私立文理学院的案例研究考察了受托人在筹款中的参与情况。虽然董事会的捐赠几乎是100%,但董事会成员很少参与索取礼物,除了彼此之间。没有一个董事会制定筹款政策,而是由校长和发展办公室制定,而且大多数受托人对其机构的发展作用知之甚少。这与实验室或理论文献的主张都不一致,这些文献认为受托人应该制定制度政策,捐赠资金,并通过推荐和征求前景来进一步推进工作。这些发现表明,我们对受托人的期望是不现实的,因为目前的角色框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信