The Technological Bias in the Establishment of a Technological Regime: the adoption and enforcement of early information processing technologies in US manufacturing, 1870-1930

A. Reinstaller, W. Hoelzl
{"title":"The Technological Bias in the Establishment of a Technological Regime: the adoption and enforcement of early information processing technologies in US manufacturing, 1870-1930","authors":"A. Reinstaller, W. Hoelzl","doi":"10.26481/umamer.2001014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a qualitative study on the adoption of early information technologies, such as typewriters, calculators or Hollerith machines in US manufacturing in the period between 1870 and 1930, which was by all means a true systemic innovation. Our empirical work is guided by a theoretical framework in which the theory of induced innovation is interpreted along \"classical\" lines in which an explicit link to the concept of technological regimes is established. We show how the presence of a distinct bias in technical change in US manufacturing led to the opening of a window of opportunity for early information technologies. We work out how the presence of this bias influenced the technological search and adoption process of firms and how this found its final reflection in the rules and heuristics of the regime, as well as the technological trajectories of the technologies. The reliance on established practices led organisation designers to cast the logic of large scale manufacturing into the administrative organisation of firms. This required the convergence of technical practices. The resulting technological trajectories and path dependencies were the outcome of the diffusion and the hardening of the early office work regime. Our analysis of US manufacturing data of the period suggests that even though electrification and \"bureaucratisation\" overlapped they cannot considered being the result of the same pattern of technology adoption, identified by the development of the capital-labour ratio.","PeriodicalId":111252,"journal":{"name":"MERIT Research Memoranda","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MERIT Research Memoranda","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26481/umamer.2001014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper presents a qualitative study on the adoption of early information technologies, such as typewriters, calculators or Hollerith machines in US manufacturing in the period between 1870 and 1930, which was by all means a true systemic innovation. Our empirical work is guided by a theoretical framework in which the theory of induced innovation is interpreted along "classical" lines in which an explicit link to the concept of technological regimes is established. We show how the presence of a distinct bias in technical change in US manufacturing led to the opening of a window of opportunity for early information technologies. We work out how the presence of this bias influenced the technological search and adoption process of firms and how this found its final reflection in the rules and heuristics of the regime, as well as the technological trajectories of the technologies. The reliance on established practices led organisation designers to cast the logic of large scale manufacturing into the administrative organisation of firms. This required the convergence of technical practices. The resulting technological trajectories and path dependencies were the outcome of the diffusion and the hardening of the early office work regime. Our analysis of US manufacturing data of the period suggests that even though electrification and "bureaucratisation" overlapped they cannot considered being the result of the same pattern of technology adoption, identified by the development of the capital-labour ratio.
技术制度建立中的技术偏见:1870-1930年美国制造业早期信息处理技术的采用和实施
本文对1870年至1930年间美国制造业采用早期信息技术(如打字机、计算器或霍尔瑞斯机器)进行了定性研究,这绝对是一次真正的系统性创新。我们的实证工作是在一个理论框架的指导下进行的,在这个理论框架中,诱导创新理论是按照“经典”的思路来解释的,在这个思路中,与技术制度的概念建立了明确的联系。我们展示了美国制造业技术变革中存在的明显偏见如何为早期信息技术打开了机会之窗。我们研究了这种偏见的存在如何影响企业的技术搜索和采用过程,以及它如何在制度的规则和启发式中找到最终反映,以及技术的技术轨迹。对既定实践的依赖导致组织设计者将大规模制造的逻辑引入公司的行政组织中。这需要技术实践的融合。由此产生的技术轨迹和路径依赖是早期办公室工作制度扩散和强化的结果。我们对这一时期美国制造业数据的分析表明,尽管电气化和“官僚化”重叠,但它们不能被认为是由资本劳动比率的发展所确定的同一种技术采用模式的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书