Rural Livelihoods and Food Insecurity among Farming Households in Southwestern Nigeria

Yaqoob A.M., M. A.R, Kabir K.S., Adeola O.O.
{"title":"Rural Livelihoods and Food Insecurity among Farming Households in Southwestern Nigeria","authors":"Yaqoob A.M., M. A.R, Kabir K.S., Adeola O.O.","doi":"10.52589/ajesd-nz7kcmyy","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rural livelihoods have been the subject of empirical analysis in development studies because they play important roles in mitigating Food Insecurity (FI). In Nigeria, the incidence of FI is higher among the rural populace, particularly the peasant farming households, than urban households. Previous studies have linked aggregate measure of rural livelihoods to FI with little attention to contributions of specific components to FI. Hence, the influence of rural livelihoods on FI status of farming households was investigated. Primary data were collected from 400 farming households in Osun and Ekiti states of Southwestern Nigeria using semi-structured questionnaire. The result shows that age of household heads was 51.9±11.4 years, while household size was 8±2.9 persons. Households that were Core Food-insecure (CFI), Moderately Food-insecure (MFI) and Non Food-insecure (NFI) were 4.38%, 35.89% and 59.73%, respectively. The probability of being NFI was increased by age (0.0115), Being Married-BM (0.1073), Household Size-HS (0.0166), Post Primary Education-PPE (0.1090), Access to Irrigation-AI (0.1376), rain forest zone (0.1417), and Financial Asset-FA (0.1630), while extension services (-0.0040) and Access to National Grid-ANG (-0.1620) reduced it. Extension services (0.0030), farming experience-FE (0.0052), and ANG (0.1202) increased the probability of being MFI, while age (-0.0085), BM (-0.0706), PPE (-0.0809), HS (-0.0123), AI (-0.1020) and rain-forest zone (-0.1051) reduced it. Extension services (0.0011), FE (0.0018), and ANG (0.0419) increased the probability of being CFI, while age (-0.0030), BM (-0.0277), PPE (-0.0282), HS (-0.0043), AI (-0.0356), rain-forest zone (-0.0366) and FA (-0.4210) reduced it. On-farm rural livelihood relative to combined on-farm with off-farm and non-farm, reduced food insecurity among farming households in Southwestern Nigeria.","PeriodicalId":406884,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52589/ajesd-nz7kcmyy","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rural livelihoods have been the subject of empirical analysis in development studies because they play important roles in mitigating Food Insecurity (FI). In Nigeria, the incidence of FI is higher among the rural populace, particularly the peasant farming households, than urban households. Previous studies have linked aggregate measure of rural livelihoods to FI with little attention to contributions of specific components to FI. Hence, the influence of rural livelihoods on FI status of farming households was investigated. Primary data were collected from 400 farming households in Osun and Ekiti states of Southwestern Nigeria using semi-structured questionnaire. The result shows that age of household heads was 51.9±11.4 years, while household size was 8±2.9 persons. Households that were Core Food-insecure (CFI), Moderately Food-insecure (MFI) and Non Food-insecure (NFI) were 4.38%, 35.89% and 59.73%, respectively. The probability of being NFI was increased by age (0.0115), Being Married-BM (0.1073), Household Size-HS (0.0166), Post Primary Education-PPE (0.1090), Access to Irrigation-AI (0.1376), rain forest zone (0.1417), and Financial Asset-FA (0.1630), while extension services (-0.0040) and Access to National Grid-ANG (-0.1620) reduced it. Extension services (0.0030), farming experience-FE (0.0052), and ANG (0.1202) increased the probability of being MFI, while age (-0.0085), BM (-0.0706), PPE (-0.0809), HS (-0.0123), AI (-0.1020) and rain-forest zone (-0.1051) reduced it. Extension services (0.0011), FE (0.0018), and ANG (0.0419) increased the probability of being CFI, while age (-0.0030), BM (-0.0277), PPE (-0.0282), HS (-0.0043), AI (-0.0356), rain-forest zone (-0.0366) and FA (-0.4210) reduced it. On-farm rural livelihood relative to combined on-farm with off-farm and non-farm, reduced food insecurity among farming households in Southwestern Nigeria.
尼日利亚西南部农村生计和农户粮食不安全状况
农村生计一直是发展研究中实证分析的主题,因为它们在缓解粮食不安全(FI)方面发挥着重要作用。在尼日利亚,农村人口,特别是农民家庭的FI发病率高于城市家庭。以前的研究将农村生计的总体衡量与FI联系起来,而很少关注特定组成部分对FI的贡献。因此,研究了农村生计对农户FI状况的影响。使用半结构化问卷从尼日利亚西南部奥孙州和埃基蒂州的400个农户中收集了原始数据。结果表明,户主年龄为51.9±11.4岁,户数为8±2.9人。核心粮食不安全家庭(CFI)、中度粮食不安全家庭(MFI)和非粮食不安全家庭(NFI)分别为4.38%、35.89%和59.73%。年龄(0.0115)、结婚(0.1073)、家庭规模(0.0166)、小学后教育(0.1090)、获得灌溉(0.1376)、热带雨林(0.1417)和金融资产(0.1630)增加了NFI的概率,而推广服务(-0.0040)和获得国家电网(-0.1620)降低了NFI的概率。推广服务(0.0030)、农作经验(0.0052)和ANG(0.1202)增加了MFI的可能性,而年龄(-0.0085)、BM(-0.0706)、PPE(-0.0809)、HS(-0.0123)、AI(-0.1020)和热带雨林(-0.1051)降低了MFI的可能性。扩展服务(0.0011)、FE(0.0018)和ANG(0.0419)增加了CFI的可能性,而年龄(-0.0030)、BM(-0.0277)、PPE(-0.0282)、HS(-0.0043)、AI(-0.0356)、热带雨林(-0.0366)和FA(-0.4210)降低了CFI的可能性。相对于农场与非农和非农业相结合的农村农业生计,减少了尼日利亚西南部农户的粮食不安全状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书