What Happens to Digital Feedback?: Studying the Use of a Feedback Capture Platform by Care Organisations

A. Dow, John Vines, Toby Lowe, R. Comber, Rob Wilson
{"title":"What Happens to Digital Feedback?: Studying the Use of a Feedback Capture Platform by Care Organisations","authors":"A. Dow, John Vines, Toby Lowe, R. Comber, Rob Wilson","doi":"10.1145/3025453.3025943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we report on a four-month long field trial of ThoughtCloud, a feedback collection platform that allows people to leave ratings and audio or video responses to simple prompts. ThoughtCloud was trialled with four organisations providing care services for people with disabilities. We conducted interviews with staff and volunteers that used ThoughtCloud before, during and after its deployment, and workshops with service users and staff. While the collection of feedback was high, only one organisation regularly reviewed and responded to collected opinions. Furthermore, tensions arose around data access and sharing, and the mismatch of values between \"giving voice\" and the capacity for staff to engage in feedback practices. We contribute insights into the challenges faced in using novel technologies in resource constrained organisations, and discuss opportunities for designs that give greater agency to service users to engage those that care for them in reflecting and responding to their opinions.","PeriodicalId":299396,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

In this paper we report on a four-month long field trial of ThoughtCloud, a feedback collection platform that allows people to leave ratings and audio or video responses to simple prompts. ThoughtCloud was trialled with four organisations providing care services for people with disabilities. We conducted interviews with staff and volunteers that used ThoughtCloud before, during and after its deployment, and workshops with service users and staff. While the collection of feedback was high, only one organisation regularly reviewed and responded to collected opinions. Furthermore, tensions arose around data access and sharing, and the mismatch of values between "giving voice" and the capacity for staff to engage in feedback practices. We contribute insights into the challenges faced in using novel technologies in resource constrained organisations, and discuss opportunities for designs that give greater agency to service users to engage those that care for them in reflecting and responding to their opinions.
数字反馈发生了什么?:研究护理机构对反馈收集平台的使用
在本文中,我们报告了对ThoughtCloud长达四个月的现场试验,这是一个反馈收集平台,允许人们对简单的提示留下评分和音频或视频回复。ThoughtCloud在四家为残疾人士提供护理服务的机构中试用。我们对在部署之前、期间和之后使用ThoughtCloud的工作人员和志愿者进行了采访,并与服务用户和工作人员进行了研讨会。虽然收集的反馈意见很多,但只有一个组织定期审查和回应收集到的意见。此外,在数据访问和共享方面出现了紧张局势,“发表意见”与员工参与反馈实践的能力之间的价值观不匹配。我们对在资源受限的组织中使用新技术所面临的挑战提供了见解,并讨论了设计的机会,这些设计赋予服务用户更大的代理,让那些关心他们的人参与反映和回应他们的意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信