Projecting the Experiment: science and the Restoration

Ted McCormick
{"title":"Projecting the Experiment: science and the Restoration","authors":"Ted McCormick","doi":"10.7228/MANCHESTER/9780719089688.003.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines the fate of Commonwealth-era science during the Restoration through two connected examples: Thomas Sprat’s History of the Royal-Society (1667), and William Petty’s naval project, the ‘Double Bottom’ (1662-1664). In different ways, both examples reveal a similar set of deep ambiguities in the Restoration’s reception of the scientific legacy of the Civil War, Commonwealth, and Protectorate (and in particular of work associated with the Hartlib Circle). In each case, a deliberate excision of political radicalism from the pursuit of productive scientific work is in tension with essential continuities in the nature of the scientific work undertaken, in the articulation of its practical potential, as well as in the problems besetting their execution and preventing their success.","PeriodicalId":106168,"journal":{"name":"From Republic to Restoration","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"From Republic to Restoration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7228/MANCHESTER/9780719089688.003.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This chapter examines the fate of Commonwealth-era science during the Restoration through two connected examples: Thomas Sprat’s History of the Royal-Society (1667), and William Petty’s naval project, the ‘Double Bottom’ (1662-1664). In different ways, both examples reveal a similar set of deep ambiguities in the Restoration’s reception of the scientific legacy of the Civil War, Commonwealth, and Protectorate (and in particular of work associated with the Hartlib Circle). In each case, a deliberate excision of political radicalism from the pursuit of productive scientific work is in tension with essential continuities in the nature of the scientific work undertaken, in the articulation of its practical potential, as well as in the problems besetting their execution and preventing their success.
投射实验:科学与复辟
本章通过两个相互关联的例子来考察复辟时期英联邦时代科学的命运:托马斯·斯普拉特的《皇家学会史》(1667)和威廉·佩蒂的海军项目“双底”(1662-1664)。这两个例子以不同的方式揭示了复辟时期在接受内战、联邦和保护国(特别是与哈特利布圈有关的工作)的科学遗产时,类似的一系列深刻的模糊性。在每一种情况下,有意将政治激进主义从生产性科学工作的追求中剔除,都与所从事的科学工作的性质、阐明其实际潜力以及困扰其执行和阻碍其成功的问题的基本连续性存在矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信