RANKING ALTERNATIVES USING PIPRECIA METHOD: A CASE OF HOTELS’ WEBSITE EVALUATION

D. Stanujkić, D. Karabašević, G. Popović
{"title":"RANKING ALTERNATIVES USING PIPRECIA METHOD: A CASE OF HOTELS’ WEBSITE EVALUATION","authors":"D. Stanujkić, D. Karabašević, G. Popović","doi":"10.5937/jpmnt9-34506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the application of the PIvot Pairwise RElative Criteria Importance Assessment (PIRECIA) method for ranking alternatives. The PIPRECIA method is primarily intended for determining the significance (weight) of criteria, but it can also be used for completely solving decision-making problems. So far, this method has not been used for completely solving multiple criteria decision-making problems, which is why this article presents the application of the PIPRECIA method for the evaluation and ranking alternatives. The process of evaluating alternatives using the PIPRECIA method is shown on an example of evaluating the websites of some hotels located in Southern and Eastern Serbia.","PeriodicalId":340365,"journal":{"name":"Journal of process management and new technologies","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of process management and new technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/jpmnt9-34506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The article presents the application of the PIvot Pairwise RElative Criteria Importance Assessment (PIRECIA) method for ranking alternatives. The PIPRECIA method is primarily intended for determining the significance (weight) of criteria, but it can also be used for completely solving decision-making problems. So far, this method has not been used for completely solving multiple criteria decision-making problems, which is why this article presents the application of the PIPRECIA method for the evaluation and ranking alternatives. The process of evaluating alternatives using the PIPRECIA method is shown on an example of evaluating the websites of some hotels located in Southern and Eastern Serbia.
使用piprecia方法对备选方案进行排名:以酒店网站评价为例
本文介绍了枢轴对相对标准重要性评估(PIRECIA)方法的应用排序方案。PIPRECIA方法主要用于确定标准的显著性(权重),但它也可以用于完全解决决策问题。到目前为止,该方法还没有完全用于解决多标准决策问题,这就是为什么本文提出了PIPRECIA方法在评估和排序方案中的应用。以评价塞尔维亚南部和东部一些酒店的网站为例,说明了利用PIPRECIA方法评价备选方案的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信