PERIOPERATIVE ANAPHYLAXIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Tasia Ma’bud
{"title":"PERIOPERATIVE ANAPHYLAXIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW","authors":"Tasia Ma’bud","doi":"10.53555/nnmhs.v9i6.1735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Perioperative anaphylaxis can be associated with antibiotics, neuromuscular blocking agents, dyes, latex, and disinfectants. This article evaluates the condition's epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment, including an allergy assessment. \n  \nAim: This investigation aims to investigate the possibility that perioperative anaphylaxis develops. \n  \nMethods: The study met the PRISMA 2020 guidelines through self-evaluation. The investigators ensured the study's current became feasible. Publications from 2015 to 2023 were searched using various online reference databases, including Pubmed and SagePub. Excluded were review papers, pre-existing publications, and incomplete articles. \n  \nResult: The search generated 552 and 321 articles in the PubMed and SagePub databases, respectively. 54 articles were found for PubMed and 21 for SagePub in the investigation conducted for the last year of 2015. A total of 18 papers were collected, with 12 generated from PubMed and 6 from SagePub. We included five studies that met the criteria. \n  \nConclusion: The presence of anesthetics, surgical settings, and various medications and substances may complicate the process of accurate diagnosis. A systematic approach was used to identify the reaction, perpetrator, and future management. Effective management of perioperative anaphylaxis requires close coordination among anesthesiology, surgery, and allergy specialists.","PeriodicalId":347955,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advance Research in Medical & Health Science (ISSN: 2208-2425)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advance Research in Medical & Health Science (ISSN: 2208-2425)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53555/nnmhs.v9i6.1735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Perioperative anaphylaxis can be associated with antibiotics, neuromuscular blocking agents, dyes, latex, and disinfectants. This article evaluates the condition's epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment, including an allergy assessment.   Aim: This investigation aims to investigate the possibility that perioperative anaphylaxis develops.   Methods: The study met the PRISMA 2020 guidelines through self-evaluation. The investigators ensured the study's current became feasible. Publications from 2015 to 2023 were searched using various online reference databases, including Pubmed and SagePub. Excluded were review papers, pre-existing publications, and incomplete articles.   Result: The search generated 552 and 321 articles in the PubMed and SagePub databases, respectively. 54 articles were found for PubMed and 21 for SagePub in the investigation conducted for the last year of 2015. A total of 18 papers were collected, with 12 generated from PubMed and 6 from SagePub. We included five studies that met the criteria.   Conclusion: The presence of anesthetics, surgical settings, and various medications and substances may complicate the process of accurate diagnosis. A systematic approach was used to identify the reaction, perpetrator, and future management. Effective management of perioperative anaphylaxis requires close coordination among anesthesiology, surgery, and allergy specialists.
围手术期过敏反应:系统回顾
背景:围手术期过敏反应可能与抗生素、神经肌肉阻滞剂、染料、乳胶和消毒剂有关。本文评估了该病的流行病学、病理生理学和治疗,包括过敏评估。目的:探讨围手术期发生过敏反应的可能性。方法:本研究通过自我评价符合PRISMA 2020指南。调查人员确保了这项研究的可行性。2015年至2023年的出版物使用各种在线参考数据库进行检索,包括Pubmed和SagePub。排除综述论文、已有出版物和不完整的文章。结果:检索在PubMed和SagePub数据库中分别产生了552篇和321篇文章。在2015年最后一年进行的调查中,PubMed和SagePub分别发现了54篇和21篇文章。共收集论文18篇,其中12篇来自PubMed, 6篇来自SagePub。我们纳入了5项符合标准的研究。结论:麻醉药、手术环境和各种药物和物质的存在可能使准确诊断过程复杂化。采用系统的方法来确定反应、肇事者和未来的管理。围手术期过敏反应的有效管理需要麻醉学、外科和过敏专家之间的密切协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信