Mirroring naturalism in word and image: a critical exchange between Émile Zola and Édouard Manet

{"title":"Mirroring naturalism in word and image: a critical exchange between Émile Zola and Édouard Manet","authors":"","doi":"10.7228/manchester/9781526125798.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores how Émile Zola’s ekphrastic writings about Édouard Manet’s paintings functioned as a template on which the writer imposed his evolving theories of the naturalist novel. It argues that, while Zola championed Manet in his critical reviews of the artist’s works, he did so in the name of naturalism and the scientific objectivity and analysis naturalism promoted. Moreover, it seems likely that Manet would have read Zola’s 1868 preface to Thérèse Raquin where the author first mandated his naturalist theories. The chapter asks what Manet would have thought about Zola’s subjugation of painting to writing and his refusal of meaningful content in his art. It proposes that Manet painted Zola’s portrait in 1868 as a retort to the critic’s misinterpretation of the painter’s artistic method. Manet’s portrait of Zola also reveals how the artist, in turn, appropriated the writer and his writing to his own artistic agenda, the subsequent manifestations of which culminate in Manet’s final masterpiece, A Bar at the Folies Bergère (1882).","PeriodicalId":383663,"journal":{"name":"Ekphrastic encounters","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekphrastic encounters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9781526125798.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter explores how Émile Zola’s ekphrastic writings about Édouard Manet’s paintings functioned as a template on which the writer imposed his evolving theories of the naturalist novel. It argues that, while Zola championed Manet in his critical reviews of the artist’s works, he did so in the name of naturalism and the scientific objectivity and analysis naturalism promoted. Moreover, it seems likely that Manet would have read Zola’s 1868 preface to Thérèse Raquin where the author first mandated his naturalist theories. The chapter asks what Manet would have thought about Zola’s subjugation of painting to writing and his refusal of meaningful content in his art. It proposes that Manet painted Zola’s portrait in 1868 as a retort to the critic’s misinterpretation of the painter’s artistic method. Manet’s portrait of Zola also reveals how the artist, in turn, appropriated the writer and his writing to his own artistic agenda, the subsequent manifestations of which culminate in Manet’s final masterpiece, A Bar at the Folies Bergère (1882).
以文字和图像反映自然主义:Émile左拉与Édouard马奈的批判性交流
本章探讨Émile左拉关于Édouard马奈绘画的文字是如何作为一个模板的,作家将他的自然主义小说的进化理论强加于此。它认为,虽然左拉在对艺术家作品的批判性评论中支持马奈,但他是以自然主义和自然主义所提倡的科学客观性和分析的名义这样做的。此外,马奈很可能读过左拉在1868年为《萨姆斯·拉昆》写的序言,在这本书中,作者首次提出了他的自然主义理论。这一章问马奈会如何看待左拉将绘画降服于写作,以及他在艺术中拒绝有意义的内容。它提出马奈在1868年画了左拉的肖像,以反驳评论家对画家艺术方法的误解。马奈的左拉肖像也揭示了艺术家如何反过来将作家和他的作品用于自己的艺术议程,随后的表现形式在马奈的最后杰作《在Folies berg re的酒吧》(1882)中达到高潮。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信