CULTURAL HERITAGE PROTECTION IN RUSSIA AND GERMANY: CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS

K. Kropinova, E. Kropinova
{"title":"CULTURAL HERITAGE PROTECTION IN RUSSIA AND GERMANY: CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS","authors":"K. Kropinova, E. Kropinova","doi":"10.5922/sikbfu-2022-4-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cultural heritage sites play an important role both in terms of the study and preservation of the culture and history of a particular territory, and in terms of their importance in recreation and tourism as a “soft power” for shaping a positive image in the geopolitical arena. These two components are directly related: the maintenance of cultural heritage objects in proper condition allows them to be used in economic activities, for example in tourism; and the economic well-being of their owners, in turn, allows them to seek funds for their restoration and reconstruction. Legal aspects have a key role to play in optimising the system of “protection-use”. Different countries have different laws governing this relationship. While both Russia and Germany are at the forefront of this issue, there are also differences, which, if identified and compared, would further optimise the legal framework. The aim is to compare the experiences of Germany and Russia in the preservation and use of cultural heritage objects. The methodology of the study is based on a study of the legal framework of these states in this field. The study compares the laws and provides concrete examples of the legal framework. Particular attention is paid to public-­private partnerships. It has been revealed that Russian legislation is more restrictive in terms of protection of cultural heritage, while the legal provisions and their practical application have stimulated the development of public-­private partnerships (PPP) in Germany, which in turn has helped to preserve and put into modern use a significant number of cultural heritage objects. This experience can also be applied to Russia.","PeriodicalId":104739,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University Series Humanities and social science","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University Series Humanities and social science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5922/sikbfu-2022-4-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cultural heritage sites play an important role both in terms of the study and preservation of the culture and history of a particular territory, and in terms of their importance in recreation and tourism as a “soft power” for shaping a positive image in the geopolitical arena. These two components are directly related: the maintenance of cultural heritage objects in proper condition allows them to be used in economic activities, for example in tourism; and the economic well-being of their owners, in turn, allows them to seek funds for their restoration and reconstruction. Legal aspects have a key role to play in optimising the system of “protection-use”. Different countries have different laws governing this relationship. While both Russia and Germany are at the forefront of this issue, there are also differences, which, if identified and compared, would further optimise the legal framework. The aim is to compare the experiences of Germany and Russia in the preservation and use of cultural heritage objects. The methodology of the study is based on a study of the legal framework of these states in this field. The study compares the laws and provides concrete examples of the legal framework. Particular attention is paid to public-­private partnerships. It has been revealed that Russian legislation is more restrictive in terms of protection of cultural heritage, while the legal provisions and their practical application have stimulated the development of public-­private partnerships (PPP) in Germany, which in turn has helped to preserve and put into modern use a significant number of cultural heritage objects. This experience can also be applied to Russia.
俄罗斯和德国的文化遗产保护:挑战与解决方案
文化遗产在研究和保护特定领土的文化和历史方面发挥着重要作用,在娱乐和旅游方面发挥着重要作用,作为一种“软实力”,在地缘政治舞台上塑造积极形象。这两个组成部分是直接相关的:将文化遗产保持在适当的状态,使它们能够用于经济活动,例如旅游业;而它们所有者的经济福利反过来又使它们能够为修复和重建寻求资金。法律方面在优化“保护-使用”制度方面发挥着关键作用。不同的国家有不同的法律来管理这种关系。虽然俄罗斯和德国都处于这一问题的前沿,但它们也存在差异,如果加以识别和比较,将进一步优化法律框架。目的是比较德国和俄罗斯在保护和利用文化遗产方面的经验。这项研究的方法是基于对这些国家在这一领域的法律框架的研究。该研究比较了法律,并提供了法律框架的具体例子。特别关注的是公私伙伴关系。据透露,俄罗斯的立法在文化遗产保护方面更为严格,而法律规定及其实际应用刺激了德国公私合作伙伴关系(PPP)的发展,这反过来又有助于保护和现代化使用大量的文化遗产。这一经验同样适用于俄罗斯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信